TY - JOUR AU - Perry, Jill A. AU - Zambo, Debby AU - Abruzzo, Emma PY - 2020/04/06 Y2 - 2024/03/29 TI - Faculty Leaders Challenges and Strategies in Redesigning EdD Programs JF - Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice JA - IE VL - 5 IS - 1 SE - From CPED Headquarters DO - 10.5195/ie.2020.143 UR - http://impactinged.pitt.edu/ojs/ImpactingEd/article/view/143 SP - AB - Producing change in higher education is not always easy or quick (Kennedy, et al., 2018; Perry, 2014a; Schuster & Finkelstein, 2006; Tierney, 1998). Conferences provide faculty with exposure to new ideas, but that exposure is often not enough to produce programmatic and structural change. In addition to new ideas, faculty must also have the tools they need to navigate change and institutional resistance when introducing and implementing new ideas. Over the last decade or so, school of education faculty, guided by the Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) have worked to redesign the Education Doctorate and make it a professional practice degree.  As a leader in educational change, CPED aims to reframe the EdD through both the cultivation of innovative ideas and the promulgation of those ideas across existing institutions and structures. CPED found faculty leaders to be necessary in creating institutional change, but also that the role of leader is a challenging one. Building upon earlier inquiries of faculty from CPED member institutions, this current study sought to discover more about the needs, challenges, and means for successful innovation implementation by EdD programmatic change leaders. ER -