EdD Graduate Perspectives: Uplifting Our Own Voices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.124Keywords:
activism, EdD graduates, underrepresented, experiences, interactionsAbstract
The purpose of this essay is to share the voices of EdD graduates who are often underrepresented or missing in the literature. To begin, we invited EdD graduates to co-author this article about the connection among their EdD program experiences and interactions and their activism. We included our definition of activism and posed three open-ended questions. Six program graduates and one professor agreed to organize the graduates’ responses by the question topics and salient themes. We asked about our experiences in the EdD program and how these influence—positively and negatively—what we are doing now (post-program). We found (a) relationships with faculty and cohort mattered; (b) instructional scaffolding was vital; and (c) faculty and cohorts reflected how lived experiences cultivated a sense of belonging and collectiveness. We also asked about our interactions with peers, cohort, advisor(s), instructors, or mentors, as well as, in what ways did these interactions affect—positively and negatively—what we are doing now (post-program). Lastly, we asked, in what ways, did the EdD program affect—positively or negatively—our activism in the classroom, community, or place of employment. We found examples of how we are shifting the landscape of academia to honor more voices in research and publication, more culturally responsive to impacted communities, and challenging the status quo. We focused on our experiences and interactions in an EdD program and how these experiences and interactions prompted activism in our current practice so that having a diversity of voices not only challenge other students, regardless of their background, to think differently about who creates, produces, and defines knowledge, as well as, support faculty that say they want to expand their curriculum and instruction, yet rely on what they know or what was taught to them in their courses.References
Ahern, K., & Manathunga, C. (2004). Clutch-starting stalled research students. Innovative Higher Education, 28(4), 237–254.
Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680574
Amrein-Beardsley, A., Zambo, D., Moore, D. W., Buss, R. R., Perry, N. J., Painter, S. R., Carlson, D. L., Foulger, T. S., Olson, K., & Puckett, K. S. (2012). Graduates respond to an innovative educational doctorate program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 7(1), 98–122.
Austin, A. E. (2009). Cognitive apprenticeship theory and its implications for doctoral education: A case example from a doctoral program in higher and adult education. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 173–183. doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106494
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
Bista, K., & Cox, D. W. (2014). Cohort-based doctoral programs: What we have learned over the last 18 years. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 1–20.
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (CPED, 2019). Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED): The knowledge forum on the EdD. Retrieved from http://www.cpedinitiative.org
Caskey, M. M., & Stevens, D. D. (2016, April). The choppy waters of academic writing for doctoral students: Using writing scaffolds to navigate the journey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Caskey, M. M., & Stevens, D. D. (2019, April). Leveraging a cognitive apprenticeship pedagogical model to support doctoral student writing and program completion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11.
Deng, M. & Harris, K. (2008 Summer). Teacher Education and Special Education, 31(3), 195-207.
Egalite, A. J., & Kisida, B. (2018). The effects of teacher match on students’ academic perceptions and attitudes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 59–81.
Ens, A. H., Boyd, K., Matczuk, L. A., & Nickerson, W. T. (2011). Graduate students’ evolving perceptions of writing collaboratively. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41(2), 62–81.
Espinosa, L., Turk, J. M., Taylor, M., & Chessman, H. M. (2019). Race and ethnicity in higher education: A status report. Retrieved from https://1xfsu31b52d33idlp13twtos-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Race-and-Ethnicity-in-Higher-Education.pdf
Dodd, S. J, & Mizrahi, T. (2017). Activism before and after graduate education: Perspectives from three cohorts of MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(3), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1272514
Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (Multicultural education series). Teachers College Press.
Gay, G., & Kirkland, K. (2003). Developing cultural critical consciousness and self-reflection in preservice teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 42(3), 181–187.
Gershenson, S., Holt, S. B., & Papageorge, N. W. (2016). Who believes in me? The effect of student-teacher demographic match on teacher expectations. Economics of Education Review, 52, 209–224.
Giroux, H. A. (1994). Border crossing: Cultural workers and the politics of education. 2nd edition. Routledge.
Hilliard, A. T. (2012). Advising doctorate candidates and candidates’ views during the dissertation process. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 7–12.
Holcomb, T. (2017, June). Required Deaf event attendance: A burden on the Deaf community? Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Sign Language Teachers Association, Salt City, UT.
Jaeger, A. J., & Haley, K. J. (2016). My story, my identity: Doctoral students of color at a research university. Qualitative Research in Education, 5(3), 276–308. https://doi:10.17583/qre.2016.2019
Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2008). The failure of dissertation advice books: Toward alternative pedagogies for doctoral writing. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 507–514.
Krashen, S. D. (1988). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Prentice-Hall International.
Ladson‐Billings, G. (1992). Reading between the lines and beyond the pages: A culturally relevant approach to literacy teaching. Theory into Practice, 31(4), 312–320.
Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 2, 63–82.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
Lei, S., Gorelick, D., Short, K., Smallwood, L., & Wright-Porter, K. (2011). Academic cohorts: Benefits and drawbacks of being a member of a community of learners. Education, 131(3), 497-504.
Li, D., & Koedel, C. (2017). Representation and salary gaps by race-ethnicity and gender at selective public universities. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17726535
Martin, S. B., Burbach, J. H., Lares Benitez, L., & Ramiz, I. (2019). Participatory action research: A tool for bringing youth knowledge to the center of research. London Review of Education on Methodological Innovation, 17(3), 297–313.
Martin, S. B., Warsame, D., Bigirimana, C., Lajustine, V, Teferra, G., Abdi, A., & Taban, J. (2018, August 4). Kakuma Refugee Camp: Where knowledge and hope resides. In P. Blessinger and E. Sengupta (Eds.). Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning (IHETL): Refugee Education: Integration and Acceptance of Refugees in Mainstream Society, 139-155. Emerald Group Publishing.
Martin, S. B., & Umubyeyi, V. (2019). What works in education in emergency: Co-researching and co-authoring. In M. Mendenhall (Ed.), NORRAG Special Issue 02 Data Collection and Evidence Building to Support Education in Emergencies, 122–125. Geneva, Switzerland: NORRAG. Retrieved from
https://resources.norrag.org/resource/view/525/276
McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Wang, K., Hein, S., Diliberti, M., Forrest Cataldi, E., Bullock Mann, F., & Barmer, A. (2019). The condition of education 2019 (NCES 2019-144). U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019144
Paré, A. (2011). Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.). Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors, and administrators, 59–74. Springer.
Picower, B. (2012). Teacher activism: Enacting a vision for social justice. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(4), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2012.717848
Purinton, T. (2012 May 15). The Ed.D. dilemma. Education Week, 31(31), 24–25.
Quinn, R., Carl, N. M. (2015). Teacher activist organizations and the development of professional agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 745-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044331
Savage, C., Hindle, R., Meyer, L. H., Hynds, A., Penetito, W., & Sleeter, C. E. (2011). Culturally responsive pedagogies in the classroom: Indigenous student experiences across the curriculum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 183–198.
Simpson, S., & Matsuda, P. K. (2008). Mentoring as a long-term relationship: Situated learning in a doctoral program. In C. P. Casanave &
X. Li (Eds.). Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders' reflections on academic enculturation, 90-104. University of Michigan Press.
Wang, T., & Li, L. Y. (2011). “Tell me what to do” vs. “guide me through it”: Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411402438
Wenger, E. (1988). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
