EdD Graduate Perspectives: Uplifting Our Own Voices

  • Staci B. Martin Portland State University
  • Kara Gournaris Western Oregon University
  • Zafreen Jaffery Behavioral Science Research Institute
  • Lisa Hatfield Oregon Health Sciences University
  • Su-Jin Jung Portland State University
  • Li Xiang Western Michigan University
  • Ingrid Anderson Portland State University
  • Micki M. Caskey Portland State University
Keywords: activism, EdD graduates, underrepresented, experiences, interactions

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to share the voices of EdD graduates who are often underrepresented or missing in the literature. To begin, we invited EdD graduates to co-author this article about the connection among their EdD program experiences and interactions and their activism. We included our definition of activism and posed three open-ended questions. Six program graduates and one professor agreed to organize the graduates’ responses by the question topics and salient themes. We asked about our experiences in the EdD program and how these influence—positively and negatively—what we are doing now (post-program). We found (a) relationships with faculty and cohort mattered; (b) instructional scaffolding was vital; and (c) faculty and cohorts reflected how lived experiences cultivated a sense of belonging and collectiveness. We also asked about our interactions with peers, cohort, advisor(s), instructors, or mentors, as well as, in what ways did these interactions affect—positively and negatively—what we are doing now (post-program). Lastly, we asked, in what ways, did the EdD program affect—positively or negatively—our activism in the classroom, community, or place of employment. We found examples of how we are shifting the landscape of academia to honor more voices in research and publication, more culturally responsive to impacted communities, and challenging the status quo. We focused on our experiences and interactions in an EdD program and how these experiences and interactions prompted activism in our current practice so that having a diversity of voices not only challenge other students, regardless of their background, to think differently about who creates, produces, and defines knowledge, as well as, support faculty that say they want to expand their curriculum and instruction, yet rely on what they know or what was taught to them in their courses.

References

Ahern, K., & Manathunga, C. (2004). Clutch-starting stalled research students. Innovative Higher Education, 28(4), 237–254.

Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680574

Amrein-Beardsley, A., Zambo, D., Moore, D. W., Buss, R. R., Perry, N. J., Painter, S. R., Carlson, D. L., Foulger, T. S., Olson, K., & Puckett, K. S. (2012). Graduates respond to an innovative educational doctorate program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 7(1), 98–122.

Austin, A. E. (2009). Cognitive apprenticeship theory and its implications for doctoral education: A case example from a doctoral program in higher and adult education. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 173–183. doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106494

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.

Bista, K., & Cox, D. W. (2014). Cohort-based doctoral programs: What we have learned over the last 18 years. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 1–20.

Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (CPED, 2019). Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED): The knowledge forum on the EdD. Retrieved from http://www.cpedinitiative.org

Caskey, M. M., & Stevens, D. D. (2016, April). The choppy waters of academic writing for doctoral students: Using writing scaffolds to navigate the journey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.

Caskey, M. M., & Stevens, D. D. (2019, April). Leveraging a cognitive apprenticeship pedagogical model to support doctoral student writing and program completion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada

Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11.

Deng, M. & Harris, K. (2008 Summer). Teacher Education and Special Education, 31(3), 195-207.

Egalite, A. J., & Kisida, B. (2018). The effects of teacher match on students’ academic perceptions and attitudes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 59–81.

Ens, A. H., Boyd, K., Matczuk, L. A., & Nickerson, W. T. (2011). Graduate students’ evolving perceptions of writing collaboratively. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41(2), 62–81.

Espinosa, L., Turk, J. M., Taylor, M., & Chessman, H. M. (2019). Race and ethnicity in higher education: A status report. Retrieved from https://1xfsu31b52d33idlp13twtos-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Race-and-Ethnicity-in-Higher-Education.pdf

Dodd, S. J, & Mizrahi, T. (2017). Activism before and after graduate education: Perspectives from three cohorts of MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(3), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1272514

Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (Multicultural education series). Teachers College Press.

Gay, G., & Kirkland, K. (2003). Developing cultural critical consciousness and self-reflection in preservice teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 42(3), 181–187.

Gershenson, S., Holt, S. B., & Papageorge, N. W. (2016). Who believes in me? The effect of student-teacher demographic match on teacher expectations. Economics of Education Review, 52, 209–224.

Giroux, H. A. (1994). Border crossing: Cultural workers and the politics of education. 2nd edition. Routledge.

Hilliard, A. T. (2012). Advising doctorate candidates and candidates’ views during the dissertation process. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 7–12.

Holcomb, T. (2017, June). Required Deaf event attendance: A burden on the Deaf community? Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Sign Language Teachers Association, Salt City, UT.

Jaeger, A. J., & Haley, K. J. (2016). My story, my identity: Doctoral students of color at a research university. Qualitative Research in Education, 5(3), 276–308. https://doi:10.17583/qre.2016.2019

Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2008). The failure of dissertation advice books: Toward alternative pedagogies for doctoral writing. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 507–514.

Krashen, S. D. (1988). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Prentice-Hall International.

Ladson‐Billings, G. (1992). Reading between the lines and beyond the pages: A culturally relevant approach to literacy teaching. Theory into Practice, 31(4), 312–320.

Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 2, 63–82.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202

Lei, S., Gorelick, D., Short, K., Smallwood, L., & Wright-Porter, K. (2011). Academic cohorts: Benefits and drawbacks of being a member of a community of learners. Education, 131(3), 497-504.

Li, D., & Koedel, C. (2017). Representation and salary gaps by race-ethnicity and gender at selective public universities. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17726535

Martin, S. B., Burbach, J. H., Lares Benitez, L., & Ramiz, I. (2019). Participatory action research: A tool for bringing youth knowledge to the center of research. London Review of Education on Methodological Innovation, 17(3), 297–313.

Martin, S. B., Warsame, D., Bigirimana, C., Lajustine, V, Teferra, G., Abdi, A., & Taban, J. (2018, August 4). Kakuma Refugee Camp: Where knowledge and hope resides. In P. Blessinger and E. Sengupta (Eds.). Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning (IHETL): Refugee Education: Integration and Acceptance of Refugees in Mainstream Society, 139-155. Emerald Group Publishing.

Martin, S. B., & Umubyeyi, V. (2019). What works in education in emergency: Co-researching and co-authoring. In M. Mendenhall (Ed.), NORRAG Special Issue 02 Data Collection and Evidence Building to Support Education in Emergencies, 122–125. Geneva, Switzerland: NORRAG. Retrieved from

https://resources.norrag.org/resource/view/525/276

McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Wang, K., Hein, S., Diliberti, M., Forrest Cataldi, E., Bullock Mann, F., & Barmer, A. (2019). The condition of education 2019 (NCES 2019-144). U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019144

Paré, A. (2011). Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.). Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors, and administrators, 59–74. Springer.

Picower, B. (2012). Teacher activism: Enacting a vision for social justice. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(4), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2012.717848

Purinton, T. (2012 May 15). The Ed.D. dilemma. Education Week, 31(31), 24–25.

Quinn, R., Carl, N. M. (2015). Teacher activist organizations and the development of professional agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 745-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044331

Savage, C., Hindle, R., Meyer, L. H., Hynds, A., Penetito, W., & Sleeter, C. E. (2011). Culturally responsive pedagogies in the classroom: Indigenous student experiences across the curriculum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 183–198.

Simpson, S., & Matsuda, P. K. (2008). Mentoring as a long-term relationship: Situated learning in a doctoral program. In C. P. Casanave &

X. Li (Eds.). Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders' reflections on academic enculturation, 90-104. University of Michigan Press.

Wang, T., & Li, L. Y. (2011). “Tell me what to do” vs. “guide me through it”: Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411402438

Wenger, E. (1988). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Published
2021-03-11
How to Cite
Martin, S. B., Gournaris, K., Jaffery, Z., Hatfield, L., Jung, S.-J., Xiang, L., Anderson, I., & Caskey, M. M. (2021). EdD Graduate Perspectives: Uplifting Our Own Voices. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.124