Strategies for Promoting Evidence Use Through the Education Doctorate
One goal of the education doctorate is to prepare educational leaders who can use research-based evidence to solve complex problems related to education and improve lives. We recently completed a mixed methods study of four EdD programs that showed the kinds of experiences that encourage their graduates to use evidence. This paper uses qualitative data from the study to describe in more detail the strategies these programs used to promote evidence use. These strategies helped students develop skills in finding, assessing, and doing research; applying research; and working with others to use research. They ranged in size from the kinds of in-class activities professors used to help students collectively process what they were learning to the coordinated set of assignments spread across three years to help students turn a work-related issue into a research problem while designing and conducting their capstone doctoral project.
Belzer, A., & Ryan, S. (2013). Defining the problem of practice dissertation: Where's the practice, what's the problem? Planning and Changing, 44(3-4), 195-207.
Bengston, E., Lasater, K., Murphy-Lee, M., & Jones, S. J. (2016). The role of research courses. In J. A. Perry (Ed.), The EdD and the scholarly practitioner (pp. 79-104). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America's schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press. https://doi:10.1002/sce.21223
Buss, R., & Zambo, D. (2016). Using action research to develop scholarly practitioners. In J. A. Perry (Ed.), The EdD and the scholarly practitioner (pp. 137-153). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (n.d.). The CPED framework. Retrieved from https://www.cpedinitiative.org/the-framework
Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9(4), 173-206. doi:10.1080/15366367.2011.626729
Cosner, S. (2019). What makes a leadership preparation program exemplary? Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 14(1), 98-115.
Cosner, S., Tozer, S., Zavitkovsky, P., & Whalen, S. P. (2015). Cultivating exemplary school leadership preparation at a research intensive university. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(1), 11-38.
Daft, R. L., & Becker, S. W. (1978). Innovation in organizations: Innovation adoption in school organizations. Elsevier.
Daly, A. J., Finnigan, K. S., Moolenar, N. M., & Che, J. (2014). The critical role of brokers in the access and use of evidence at the school and district level. In K. S. Finnigan, & A. J. Daly (Eds.), Using research evidence in education: From the schoolhouse door to Capitol Hill. (pp. 13-32). Springer.
Farley-Ripple, E. N. (2012). Research use in school district central office decision making: A case study. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(6), 786-806. doi:10.1177/1741143212456912
Firestone, W. A., Perry, J. A., Leland, A. S., & McKeon, R. T. (2021). Teaching research and data use in the education doctorate. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 16(1), 81-102. doi:10.1177/1942775119872231
Firestone, W. A., Louis, K. S., Perry, J. A., Leland, A. & McKeon, R. (2020). Teaching evidence use to educational leaders: The Ed.D.'s contribution. AERA Annual Meeting, April, 2020 online.
Honig, M. I., & Donaldson Walsh, E. (2019). Learning to lead the learning of leaders: The evolution of the University of Washington’s education doctorate. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 14(1), 51-73. doi:10.1177/1942775118819673
Kvale, S. (2008). Doing interviews. Sage.
Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of educational research. University of Chicago Press.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Neal, J., Neal, Z., Kornbluh, M., Mills, K., & Lawlor, J. (2015). Brokering the research-practice gap: A typology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56(3), 422-435. doi:10.1007/s10464-015-9745-8
Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Policy Press.
Osterman, K., Furman, G., & Sernak, K. (2014). Action research in EdD programs in educational leadership. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 9(1), 85-105. doi:10.1177/1942775113498378
Penuel, W. R., Farrell, C. C., Allen, A., Toyama, Y., & Coburn, C. E. (2018). What research district leaders find useful. Educational Policy, 32(4), 540-568. doi:10.1177/0895904816673580
Prestine, N., & Malen, B. (2005). The case for revitalizing the dissertation. UCEA Review, 47(2), 7-9.
Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. M., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education's doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25-32.
Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., Garcia, J., & Nolly, G. (2004). Equity audits: A practical leadership tool for developing equitable and excellent schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 133-161.
Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281-300.
Weiss, C. H., & Bucuvalas, M. J. (1980). Social science research and decision-making. Columbia University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Copyright (c) 2021 William A. Firestone, Andrew S. Leland
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.