Preparing Education Researchers: Identifying Necessary Competencies for Teachers, Administrators, and Student Affairs Professionals

Keywords: education research competencies, professional standards, education program curriculum

Abstract

This descriptive study aimed to answer two research questions: (a) what are the assessment, evaluation, and research (AER) competencies necessary for three educator types (teachers, K-12 administrators, and higher education student affairs professionals); and (b) what are the similarities and differences in competencies by educator type? Current professional standards for each educator type were identified and coded for alignment with AER topics, then reviewed for similarities and differences. Results suggest that teacher competency standards focus heavily on assessment; administrator competencies focus on ethical decision making and continuous improvement; and student affairs professional standards focus on advocacy and supporting institutional mission. These results imply that education preparation programs may need to adjust AER course curriculum and instruction to align with distinct educator needs.

References

Aguado, N. A. (2009). Teaching research methods: Learning by doing. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(2): 251-260.

American College Personnel Association & National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (2015). ACPA and NASPA professional competency areas for student affairs educators. https://www.naspa.org/images/uploads/main/ACPA_NASPA_Professional_Competencies_FINAL.pdf

American College Personnel Association & National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (2016). ACPA and NASPA professional competencies rubrics. https://www.naspa.org/images/uploads/main/ACPA_NASPA_Professional_Competency_Rubrics_Full.pdf

American Council on Education. (1937). The student personnel point of view. https://www.naspa.org/files/dmfile/Student_Personnel_Point_of_View_1937.pdf

American Council on Education. (1949). The student personnel point of view. https://www.naspa.org/images/uploads/main/Student_Personnel_Point_of_View_1949.pdf

Banta, T. W., & Palomba, C. A. (2015). Assessment essentials (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Bowers, A. J. (2017). Quantitative research methods training in education leadership and administration preparation programs as disciplined inquiry for building school improvement capacity. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12(1), 72-96.

Council of Chief State School Officers (2013, April). Interstate teacher assessment and support consortium (InTASC) model core teaching standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0: A resources for ongoing teacher development. https://ccsso.org/sites/default/files/2017-12/2013_INTASC_Learning_Progressions_for_Teachers.pdf

Council of Chief State School Officers (2020, July). About us. https://ccsso.org/about

Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (2020, July). History of CAEP. http://www.ncate.org/about/history

Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Research on teaching and teacher education and its influences on policy and practice. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 83-91.

DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2015). Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 251-272.

Denham, B. (1997). Teaching research methods to undergraduates. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 51(4): 54-62.

Earley, M. A. (2014). A synthesis of the literature on research methods education. Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, 19(3), 242-253.

Evans, N. J., & Reason, R. D. (2001). Guiding principles: A review and analysis of student affairs philosophical statements. Journal of College Student Development, 42(4), 359.

Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6): 709-726.

Hamrick, F. A., & Edwards, M. N. (2017). Assessment in student affairs by John H. Schuh, J. Patrick Biddix, Laura A. Dean, and Jillian Kinzie. Journal of College Student Development, 58(5), 790-792.

Herdlein, R. J. (2004). Survey of chief student affairs officers regarding relevance of graduate preparation programs. NASPA Journal, 42(1), 51-71.

Hevel, M. S. (2016). Toward a history of student affairs: A synthesis of research, 1996-2015. Journal of College Student Development, 57(7), 844-862.

Ho, A. (2017). Advancing educational research and student privacy in the “big data” era. National Academy of Education. https://naeducation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Ho-FINAL.pdf

Jones, G. M. (2014). Pathways: An exploration of factors influencing scholarship among student affairs practitioners [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Georgia, Athens, USA). https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/jones_ginny_m_201405_phd.pdf

Lei, S. A. (2010). College research methodology courses: Revisiting general instructional goals and objectives. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(3), 236-240.

Lewthwaite, S., & Nind, M. (2016). Teaching research methods in the social sciences: Expert perspectives on pedagogy and practice. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(4), 413-430.

Madalin ́ska-Michalak, J. (2020). Fostering quality education research: The role of the European Educational Research Association as a scientific association. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 30-42.

Mullen, C. A. (2000). Linking research and teaching: A study of graduate student engagement. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 5-21.

National Academy of Education (2017). Big data in education: Balancing the benefits of educational research and student privacy: Workshop summary. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED574440.pdf.

National Council on Measurement in Education. (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. ERIC Clearinghouse. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED323186.pdf

National Policy Board for Educational Administration (2018a). Preparing for the National Educational Leadership Preparation (NELP) program review: A companion guide. http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Companion-Guide.pdf

National Policy Board for Educational Administration (2018b). National Educational Leadership Preparation (NELP) program standards: Building level. http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf

National Policy Board for Educational Administration (2015). Professional Standards for Educational Leaders (PSEL) 2015. https://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders_2015.pdf

Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (2015). Planning and designing useful evaluations. In K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, & J. S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (4th ed., pp. 7-35). John Wiley & Sons.

Nguyen, D. J., Mathews, K., Herron, A., Troyer, R., Graman, Z., Goode, W. A., Shultz, A., Tackett, K., & Moss, M. (2019). Learning to become a scholar-practitioner through research experiences. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 56(4), 365-378.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Phelps-Ward, R., Kenney, J., & Howard, J. L. (2017). Epistemology, pedagogy, and student affairs assessment: A voluminous framework for equity. The Journal of Student Affairs Inquiry, 2(1), 1-21.

Price, L. (2019). The psychology of education review: Open dialogue. Response to Professor Entwistle’s paper entitled “Contributions of educational psychology to understanding student learning: What has been discovered—What more could be done?” Psychology of Education Review, 43(1), 28-33.

Ralston, N. C., Weitzel, B., Waggoner, J., Naegele, Z., & Smith, R. (2016). The partnership pact: Fulfilling school districts’ research needs with university-district partnerships. AILACTE (Association of Independent Liberal Arts Colleges for Teacher Education) Journal, 13(1), 59-75.

Saldaña, J. (2015) The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.

Schroeder, C. C., & Pike, G. R. (2001). The scholarship of application in student affairs. Journal of College Student Development, 42(4), 342-355.

Sriram, R. (2011). Engaging research as student affairs professionals. NASPA NetResults: Critical Issues for Student Affairs Practitioners. https://works.bepress.com/rishi_sriram/10/

Sriram, R., & Oster, M. (2012). Reclaiming the "scholar" in scholar-practitioner. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 49(4), 377-396.

Waple, J. N. (2006). An assessment of skills and competencies for entry-level student affairs work. NASPA Journal, 43(1), 1-18.

Wieting, S. G. (1975). Simulated research experiences for use in teaching research methods. Teaching Sociology, 3(1), 33-59.

Young, D. G., & Janosik, S. M. (2007). Using CAS standards to measure learning outcomes of student affairs preparation programs. NASPA Journal, 44(2), 341-366.

Published
2021-10-19
How to Cite
Cole, A. ., & Smith, R. (2021). Preparing Education Researchers: Identifying Necessary Competencies for Teachers, Administrators, and Student Affairs Professionals. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(4), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.181
Section
Research Articles