Building Critical Inquiry in the Online EdD: Examining Successes & Challenges

Authors

  • Eric Ludwig Florida State University
  • Courtney Preston Florida State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.188

Keywords:

critical inquiry, online learning, online EdD, education doctorate

Abstract

In this essay, we apply Garrison et al.’s (2000, 2003) framework for critical inquiry in online learning to a review of a cohort-based online EdD at a large public research-intensive university. We examine the technological, pedagogical, and organizational successes and challenges we have experienced and encounter in building and sustaining critical inquiry in a fully online doctoral program. Includes considerations for faculty and administrators in developing and managing online EdD programs committed to engaging in critical inquiry and reflection.

References

Blagg, K. (2018). The rise of master’s degrees: Master’s programs are increasingly diverse and online. Urban

Institute. Retrieved from https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/99501/the_rise_of_masters_degrees_1.pdf

Bruce, B. C., & Levin, J. A. (1997). Educational technology: Media for inquiry, communication, construction,

and expression. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(1), 79-102.

Feldstein, M. (2017). What is the next generation? Educause Review, 52 (4). Retrieved from

https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/7/what-is-the-next-generation

Gardner, L. (2019). Students under surveillance? Data-tracking enters a provocative new phase. The Chronicle

of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Students-Under-Surveillance-/247312

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer

conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.

Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues,

and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172.

Garrison, D. R., Archer, W., & Anderson, T. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. In

M. Moore & G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 113–127). Erlbaum.

Gilliard, C. (2017). Pedagogy and the logic of platforms. Educause Review, 52(4). Retrieved from

https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/7/pedagogy-and-the-logic-of-platforms

Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online

courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4-29.

Kim, J. (2018). 5 ways I got the future of the LMS wrong. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from

https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/blogs/technology-and-learning/5-ways-i-got-future-lms-wrong

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.).

Cengage Learning.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (2020). The condition of

education: Postbaccalaureate enrollment. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe

Pomerantz, J., Brown, M., & Brooks, D. C. (2018). Foundations for a Next Generation Digital

Learning Environment: Faculty, students, and the LMS. ECAR. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/foundations-for-a-next-generation-digital-learning-environment-faculty-students-and-the-lms/introduction

Raths, D. (2018). When learning analytics violate student privacy. Campus Technology. Retrieved from

https://campustechnology.com/articles/2018/05/02/when-learning-analytics-violate-student-privacy.aspx

Saba, F. (2011). Distance education in the United States: Past, present, future. Educational

Technology, 51(6), 11-18.

Seaman, J., E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United

States. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com

Simpson, M., & Anderson, B. (2012). History and heritage in open, flexible and distance education. Journal of

Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 16(2), 1-10.

Sumner, J. (2000). Serving the system: A critical history of distance education. Open Learning, 15(3), 267-285.

Watters, A. (2014). Beyond the LMS. Hack Education. Retrieved from

http://hackeducation.com/2014/09/05/beyond-the-lms-newcastle-university

Downloads

Published

2021-07-30

How to Cite

Ludwig, E., & Preston, C. (2021). Building Critical Inquiry in the Online EdD: Examining Successes & Challenges. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(3), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.188

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021): Online EdD Programs

Section

Themed - Online EdD

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.