Complexities of Practitioner Research: Seeking Hallmarks of Quality




practitioner research, methods, quality, graduate education


The emphasis in Ed.D. programs on professional knowledge and practical research means methodological training in these programs must prepare their candidates for the career demands graduates will likely encounter; practitioner research is well-suited to this task. Yet, the lower status traditionally accorded to practitioner research, along with an absence of clear guidelines for its methodology and quality, challenge its acceptance as a form of knowledge production. The current study analyzes 74 accounts of practitioner research in literacy for evidence of methodological quality. Findings reveal ways practitioner researchers systematically conduct and report their inquiries as well as areas for improvement. The hallmarks of quality identified in this study can be used by research educators to advance practitioner research as a methodology and knowledge generating endeavor.

Author Biography

Maida Finch, Salisbury University

Associate Professor and Department Chair, Literacy Studies


Anderson, G. L. (2002). Reflecting on research for doctoral students in education. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 22–25.

Anderson, G. L., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12–40.

Blakely, E., & Hemphill, D. (2021). Opening third spaces for research in education: Challenging the limits of technocratic methods. Myers Education Press.

Brett, A. T. (2016). Seeking a balance: Discussion strategies that foster reading with authorial empathy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 60(3), 295–304.

Broderick, D. (2014). Collaborative design: Participatory culture meets multiliteracies in a high school literary arts community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(3), 198–208.

Bullough, R. V, & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.

Buss, R. R. (2018). Using Action Research as a signature pedagogy to develop EdD students’ inquiry as practice abilities. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 3(1), 23–31.

Cease, B., & Wilmarth, M. (2016). Blogging about books: How choice in modality influences upper elementary students’ responses to reading. Talking Points, 28(1), 3–9.

Chanski, S., & Ellis, L. (2017). Which helps writers more, receiving peer feedback or giving it? The English Journal, 6(106), 54–60.

Check, J. W., & Schutt, R. K. (2011). Research methods in education. SAGE Publications.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Donnell, K. (2006). Practitioner inquiry: Blurring the boundaries of research and practice. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, P. B. Elmore, A. Skukauskaite, & E. Grace (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (Vol. 2, pp. 503–515). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside outside: Teacher research and knowledge. Teachers College Press.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. L. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education (pp. 601–649). Springer.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morris, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Crowell, C. G. (2015). What is DIBELS? Talking Points, 26(2), 2–9.

Currin, E. (2019). From rigor to vigor: The past, present, and potential of inquiry as stance. Journal of Practitioner Research, 4(1).

Dana, N. F. (2016). The relevancy and importance of practitioner research in contemporary times. Journal of Practitioner Research, 1(1).

Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2020). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Duran, R. P., Eisenhart, M. A., Erickson, F. D., Grant, C. A., Green, J. L., Hedges, L. V, & Schneider, B. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications: American Educational Research Association. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33–40.

Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publishing.

Finch, M.A. (2021). Making sense of methods: What does systematic and intentional practitioner research look like? Journal of Practitioner Research, 6(2), 3.

Flessner, R., & Klehr, M. (2016). Lessons from the teaching of teacher research. The Educational Forum, 80(4), 479–480.

Gatto, L. (2013). “Lunch Is gross”: Gaining access to powerful literacies. Language Arts, 90(4), 241–252.

Gericke, N. J., & Salmon, L. G. (2013). Digging deeper into the culture of writing: Do mentor texts inspire male students to write? Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 15(2).

Guerin, A., & Murphy, B. (2015). Repeated reading as a method to improve reading fluency for struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 58(7), 551–560.

Heffernan, L., & Lewison, M. (2009). Keep your eyes on the prize: Critical stance in the middle school classroom. Voices from the Middle, 17(2), 19–27.

Heikkinen, H. L. T., de Jong, F. P. C. M., & Vanderlinde, R. (2016). What is (good) practitioner research? Vocations and Learning, 9(1), 1–19.

Heikkinen, H. L. T., Huttunen, R., & Syrjälä, L. (2007). Action research as narrative: Five principles for validation. Educational Action Research, 15(1), 5–19.

Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2015). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.

Hochbein, C., & Perry, J. A. (2013). The role of research in the professional doctorate. Planning & Changing, 44(3/4), 181–195.

Hochbein, C., & Smeaton, K. S. (2018). An exploratory analysis of the prevalence of quantitative research concepts in journal articles. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 13(11).

Hoffman, J. V., Wilson, M. B., Martinez, R. A., & Sailors, M. (2011). Content analysis: The past, present, and future. In N. K. Duke & M. H. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content anaylsis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Huberman, M. (1996). Moving mainstream: Taking a closer look at teacher research. Language Arts, 73(2), 124–140.

Juana, M. B., & Palak, D. (2011). Podcasting as a means of improving Spanish speaking skills in the foreign language classroom: An action research study. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 13(1).

Knieling, M. (2016). “An offense to their human rights”: Connecting Bud, not Buddy to the Flint water crisis with middle school ELA students. Voices from the Middle, 24(1), 31–35.

Kochhar-Bryant, C. A. (2017). Symbiotic space: Exploring the nexus of rigor, problems of practice and implementation. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 2(1), 6–14.

Lafferty, K. E., Summers, A., Tanaka, S., & Cavanagh, J. (2016). Evaluating multiple perspectives: Approaching the synthesis task through assessing credibility. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 59(5), 587–598.

Levin, M. (2012). Academic integrity in action research. Action Research, 10(2), 133–149.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), New directions for program evaluation (pp. 73–84). Jossey-Bass.

Lobron, A., & Selman, R. (2007). The interdependence of social awareness and literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 60(6), 528–537.

McGee, A. R. (2011). Climbing walls: Attempting critical pedagogy as a 21st-century preservice teacher. Language Arts, 88(4), 270–277.

Mertler, C. A. (2016). Introduction to educational research. SAGE Publications.

Miller, M., & Shinas, V. H. (2019). Inquiring about inquiry: A research journey. Journal of Practitioner Research, 4(1).

Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.

Moratelli, K., & Dejarnette, N. K. (2014). Clickers to the rescue: Technology integration helps boost literacy scores. Reading Teacher, 67(8), 586–593.

Nichols, S., & Cormack, P. (2017). Impactful practitioner inquiry: The ripple effect on classooms, schools, and teacher professionalism. Teachers College Press.

Nixon, R. L. (2012). Treating praxis as stance for teacher researchers in grade six science. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 14(2).

Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., van der Steen, J., & Nijveldt, M. (2014). A study of the quality of practitioner research in secondary education: impact on teacher and school development. Educational Action Research, 22(1), 122–139.

Ortiz, A., Ferrell, D., Anderson, J., Cain, L., Fluty, N., Sturzenbecker, S., & Matlock, T. (2014). Teacher research on boys’ literacy in one elementary school. Voices of Practitioners, 9(1), 1–19.

Pankratz, L. M. (2015). Building with blocks: Incorporating picture books to motiate and guide block play in kindergarten. Voices of Practitioners, 10(2), 64–79.

Parsons, S. A., Gallagher, M. A., Ainger, J., Bartolini, M. C., Bruyning, A. K., Clark, E., Crain, S., Daoud, N., Doheney, K. S., Duff, S., Groundwater, S. V., Heller, J., Jensen, A., King, L. A., Lindenauer, J., Newton, J., Parsons, A. W., Ramirez, E. M., Sherman, J., & Smith, P. (2016). A content analysis of nine literacy journals, 2009-2014. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(4), 476–502.

Petrich, N. (2015). Book clubs: Conversations inspiring community. ie: inquiry in education, 7(1).

Ragland, J., & Palace, C. (2017). Literature circles for adolescent developmental readers. The English Journal, 106(6), 35–40.

Rust, F., & Meyers, E. (2006). The bright side: Teacher research in the context of educational reform and policy-making. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 69–86.

Schaenen, I., Kohnen, A., Flinn, P., Saul, W., & Zeni, J. (2012). “I” is for “insider”: Practitioner research in schools. International Journal of Action Research, 8(1), 68–101.

Schroeder, S. (2020). Bad inquiry: How accountability, power, and deficit thinking hinder pre-service practitioner inquiry. Journal of Practitioner Research, 5(1).

Stieglitz, A. (2021, June 7). Rethinking rigor in action research, with Dr. Alfredo Ortiz Aragón (No. 20) [Audio podcast episode]. The Action Research Podcast.

Stremmel, A. J. (2007). The value of teacher research: Nuturing professional and personal growth through inquiry. Voices of Practitioners, 2(3), 1–9.

The CPED Framework. (2021). Carnegie Project for the Education Doctorate.

Tomczak, K. G. (2014). How does talk around reading influence comprehension in third grade? Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 16(2), 456–456.

Toth, A. (2013). Not just for after lunch: Accelerating vocabulary growth during read-aloud. The Reading Teacher, 67(3), 203–207.

Whitecotton, E. (2013). Readers coaching readers?: A teacher’s reflection on discursive positioning in an elementary classroom. Talking Points, 25(1), 12–19.

Witte, P. G. (2016). Teaching first graders to comprehend complex texts through read-alouds. The Reading Teacher, 70(1), 29–38.

Zeichner, K. M., & Noffke, S. E. (2001). Practitioner research. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 298–330). American Educational Research Association.

Zuber-Skerritt, O., & Fletcher, M. (2007). The quality of an action research thesis in the social sciences. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(4), 413–436.




How to Cite

Finch, M. (2022). Complexities of Practitioner Research: Seeking Hallmarks of Quality. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 7(3), 1–10.



Research Manuscripts