The Architecture of the Unknown

Constructing a Flexible EdD Program

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2024.388

Keywords:

innovation, risk-taking, third place, COVID-19, ungrading

Abstract

Beginning in the summer of 2019, the College of St. Scholastica endeavored to build a flexible, adaptable EdD program grounded in the guiding principles of CPED. This meant establishing a welcoming and safe program dedicated to cultivating justice-minded change makers. It also meant constructing a curriculum that would accommodate differing student backgrounds, be responsive to fluctuating consumer demands, and function as context-inclusive in an ever-evolving and intersecting space. While this alone was certainly a challenge, we did not anticipate that a global pandemic would present the most significant test of what we had created. To accomplish the aforementioned goals, the program architecture was dependent on the following structural considerations: a broadening of the target participant profile to include students across various social sectors; the use of design thinking as an asset in supporting innovation, creativity and flexibility; the inclusion of credit-bearing “third-place” courses intended to provide open-ended space and place for community building and reflective, intentional action; and an approach to course design that encouraged risk-taking by students with a focus on cultivating mindsets and skills around equity and social justice. None of these attributes on their own provided total protection from seismic societal, cultural or market shifts. Collectively, however, they offered a unique environment for the culturing of a particular type of doctoral experience, unique in its elasticity compared to more traditional, inflexible designs. This essay details the ways in which we attempted to create an inclusive, innovative, flexible structure, as validated (and challenged) by the COVID-19 pandemic.

References

Ball, C. E., Sheppard, J., & Arola, K. L. (2022). Writer designer: A guide to making multimodal projects (3rd ed.). Macmillan.

Bawa, P. (2016). Retention on online courses: Exploring issues and solutions-a literature review. Sage Journals. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244015621777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777

Blum, S. (Ed.). (2020). Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead). West Virginia U Press.

Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (2022). The CPED framework. https://www.cpedinitiative.org/the-framework

Gardner, S. K. (2008). Fitting the mold of graduate school: A qualitative study of socialization in doctoral education. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 125–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9068-x

Golde, C. M. (2000, Winter). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 199–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2000.0004

Liedtka, J., Salzman, R., & Azer, D. (2017). Design thinking for the greater good: Innovation in the social sector. Columbia University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/lied17952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/lied17952

Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman & Littlefield.

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). (2022). Survey of earned doctorates: Data tables. National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf22300/data-tables

Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801882326

Oldenburg, R. (2013). The café as a third place. In Tjora, A., Scambler, G. (Eds.), Café society (pp. 7-21). Palgrave Macmillan.

Panke, S. (2019). Design thinking in education: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022

Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864

Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday.

Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.

Stanford d.school (2018). Resources: Design thinking bootleg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315232102-12

https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/design-thinking-bootleg

Stommel, J. (2021). Ungrading: An introduction. Jesse Stommel. https://www.jessestommel.com/ungrading-an-introduction/

Sweetland Center for Writing. (2023). Supporting multimodal literacy. University of Michigan. https://lsa.umich.edu/sweetland/instructors/

guides-to-teaching-writing/supporting-multimodal-literacy.html

Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? Jossey Bass.

Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). An introduction to communities of practice: a brief overview of the concept and its uses. https://www.wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice

Cover Page

Downloads

Published

2024-01-29

How to Cite

Lucarelli, C. L., Murzyn, A. L., Ridenour, M. J., & Witikko, N. B. (2024). The Architecture of the Unknown: Constructing a Flexible EdD Program. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 9(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2024.388

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Designing, Developing, and Sustaining Doctoral Programs in a Post-Pandemic Age

Section

Themed - Designing, Developing, and Sustaining Doctoral Programs in a Post-Pandemic Age

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Chery L. Lucarelli, Amy L. Murzyn, Matthew J. Ridenour, Neil B. Witikko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.