Faculty Leaders Challenges and Strategies in Redesigning EdD Programs

Jill A. Perry, Debby Zambo, Emma Abruzzo

Abstract


Producing change in higher education is not always easy or quick (Kennedy, et al., 2018; Perry, 2014a; Schuster & Finkelstein, 2006; Tierney, 1998). Conferences provide faculty with exposure to new ideas, but that exposure is often not enough to produce programmatic and structural change. In addition to new ideas, faculty must also have the tools they need to navigate change and institutional resistance when introducing and implementing new ideas. Over the last decade or so, school of education faculty, guided by the Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) have worked to redesign the Education Doctorate and make it a professional practice degree.  As a leader in educational change, CPED aims to reframe the EdD through both the cultivation of innovative ideas and the promulgation of those ideas across existing institutions and structures. CPED found faculty leaders to be necessary in creating institutional change, but also that the role of leader is a challenging one. Building upon earlier inquiries of faculty from CPED member institutions, this current study sought to discover more about the needs, challenges, and means for successful innovation implementation by EdD programmatic change leaders.

Keywords


education doctorate (EdD); change leader; CPED; redesign; resister; institutional; programmatic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adler, J. & Karlsberg, R. (2005),7 Strategies for Sustained Innovation. Retrieved 6 March 2020 from https://innovationmanagement.se/imtool-articles/7-strategies-for-sustained-innovation/

Carnegie Project for the Educational Doctorate (CPED). (2010). Design concept definitions. Retrieved from http://cpedinitiative.org

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. 1967. Weidenfield & Nicolson, London, 1-19.

Kennedy, B., Altman, M., & Pizano, A. (2018). Engaging in the battle of snails by challenging the traditional dissertation model. Impacting Education (3). DOI

5195/ie.2018.27

Meyerson, D. E. (2003). Tempered radicals: How everyday leaders inspire change at work. Boston, MA Harvard Business School Press.

Meyerson, D., & Scully, M. (1995). Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science, 6(5), 585–600.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Perry, J.A. (2012). What does history reveal about the education doctorate? In Macintyre Latta, M. & Wunder, S. (Eds.). Placing Practitioner Knowledge at the Center of

Teacher Education: Rethinking the Policy and Practice of the Education Doctorate. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

Perry, J.A. (2014a). The CPED Argument: A Counter-Response. UCEA Review, 22-24.

Perry, J.A. (2014b). Changing schools of education through grassroots faculty-led change. Innovation in Higher Education 39(2), 144-168

Perry, J.A., Zambo, D. & Wunder, S. (2015). Understanding How Schools of Education have Redesigned the Doctorate of Education. Journal of School Public Relations, 36, 58-85.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press

Schuster, J., & Finkelstein, M. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

Shulman, L. S., Golde, C.M., Bueschel, A.C., & Garabedian, K.J. (2006). Reclaiming education's doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25-32.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Tierney, W.G. (1998). Organizational culture in higher education: Defining the essentials. The Journal of Higher Education, (59),1, pp. 2-21.

Wergin, J.F. (2011). Rebooting the EdD. Harvard Educational Review, 81(1), 119-140.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2020.143



Copyright (c) 2020 Jill A. Perry, Debby Zambo, Emma Abruzzo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.