Creating a Culture of Activism in the Education Doctorate

Authors

  • Christine Lynn Mcclure

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.128

Keywords:

higher education, graduate education, diversity, inclusion

Abstract

 

Attempting to combine activism and scholarship would seem natural because most academic research is born out of a deep-rooted desire to change, eradicate, or transform a societal issue. As such, translating research into practice by way of activism would seem conventional for most scholars, because it is “informed by both personal and political values and the need to engage our emotional responses to the world around us” (Derickson & Routledge, 2015, p. 5). However, the elite, “ivory-tower” of the academy is not so accepting of scholar-activists. Perhaps it is because activism places higher education in the cross hairs of the criticisms, critiques, and call-outs that activism seeks to influence. Institutions of higher education have done a mediocre job at cultivating spaces for academics to freely engage in activism, as academics who desire to participate in activism face considerable and specific career-related risks (Flood et al., 2013). Loss of tenure, reduced opportunities for collaboration, decreased funding, isolation, and oftentimes physical threats are but a few strategies used against academics who openly participate in activism. While many activist movements have been birthed on college and university campuses, very few demonstrate a willingness to embrace the causes or individuals involved in these activist movements. As institutions of higher education try to strengthen both the policies and practices related to diversity, equity, and inclusion it is imperative that they also examine the oppressive structures, antiquated hiring practices, and exclusionary curriculum that inhibit the culture of activism from thriving. These three specific areas are the focus for this article.

Author Biography

Christine Lynn Mcclure

Christine McClure, Ed. D, currently serves as the Program Director for Research at the National Council for Juvenile and Family Court Judges. She works in partnership with the National Council for Juvenile Justice Director and other program staff to manage the research needs and activities for all programs. Translating research information for practice professionals, which assists jurisdictions/agencies implement continuous quality improvement, and measure performance is her primary responsibility.  Christine holds multiple degrees including a Bachelor of Science in health services administration and biology, dual Master’s degrees in business administration and public policy management, and a doctorate in education.

References

American Federation of Teachers (2010). Promoting racial and ethnic diversity in the faculty: What higher education unions can do. https://www.aft.org/sites/default/fles/factuly diversity0310.pdf

Basu, K. (2012). The country’s oldest Ed.D. program will close down. Inside Higher Ed.

Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (n.d.) The Knowledge Forum on the EdD. https://www.cpedinitiative.org/.

Cole. R., & Heineckle, W. (2018). Higher education after neoliberalism: Student activism as a guiding light. Policy Futers in Education, 18(1), 90-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318767459.

Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought. NY Routledge.

Cremin, L. (1978). The education of the educating professions. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.

Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.

Dictionary.com (2019). Retrieved from Dictionary.com Activism | Definition of Activism at Dictionary.com.

Derickson, D., & Routledge, P. (2015). Resourcing scholar-activism: Collaboration transformation, and the production of knowledge. The Professional Geographer, 67(1), 1-7.

Farnun, R. (2016). Scholactivism –a growing movement of scholar-activists. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20160530142606345.

Flaherty, C. (2015). Demanding 10 Percent, Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/11/30/student-activists-want-more-black-faculty-members-how-realistic-are-some-their-goals.

Flaherty, C. (2016). More Faculty Diversity, Not on Tenure Track. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/08/22/study-finds-gains-faculty-diversity-not-tenure-track.

Flood, M., Martin, B., & Dreher, T. (2013). Combining academia and activism. Australian Universities’ Review, (55)1, 17-26.

Harris, C. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1709-1791.

Harris, J.C., Linder, C. (2018). The racialized experiences of students of color in higher education and student affairs graduate preparation programs. The Journal of College Student Development, 59(2), 141-158.

hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.

McClure, C. (2018). Count-our-space: Examining the counterspaces of Black woman pursing a doctorate in education [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh]. ProQuest Dissertation Thesis Global

National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Race/ethnicity of college faculty: 2017. Washington, DC.

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Earned Doctorates. (2018). Statistical profile of postgraduation plans of doctorate recipients, by ethnicity, race, and citizen status:2018. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf20301/fata-tables@group7

National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2019. Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: 2018. Special Report NSF 20-301. Alexandria, VA.

Nelson, J.K., Coorough, C. (1994). Content analysis of the PhD versus the EdD dissertation. Journal of Experimental Education, 62(2), 158-168.

Patton, L.D. (2016). Disrupting postsecondary prose: Toward a critical race theory of higher education. Urban Education, 51(3), 315-342.

Patton, L. D., Harper, S. R., & Harris, J. C. (2015). Using critical race theory to (re)interpret widely studied topics related to students in US higher education. In A. M. Martinez Aleman, B. Pusser, & E. M. Bensimon (Eds.), Critical approaches to the study of higher education (pp. 193--219). John Hopkins University Press.

Perry, J. (2012). What does history reveal about the education doctorate? Latta & Wunder (Eds.). Placing practitioner knowledge at the center of teach education (pp.51-75). Information Age Publishing.

Perry, J. (2015) The Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(3), 56-61, https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2015.1040712

Perry, J. (2015). The Carnegie project on the education doctorate. Change: The Magazine of Higher Education, 47 (3), 56-61.

Scott, D. (2016). Ph.D. vs. Ed.D.: Which terminal degree is right for you? Inside Higher Ed. http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/gradhacker/phd-vs-edd

Thelin, J. (2004). A history of American higher education. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Umbach, P. (2006). The contribution of faculty of color to undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 47(3), 317-345.

Wall, M.L. (2013). Using balanced learning course design to reduce resistance to diversity curricula. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 5(2), 45-54.

Zambrana, R.E., Ray, R., Castro, C., Cohen, B., & Eliason, J. (2015). Don’t leave us behind: The importance of mentoring for underrepresented minority faculty. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 40-72.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-11

How to Cite

Mcclure, C. L. (2021). Creating a Culture of Activism in the Education Doctorate. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(1), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.128

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Energizing Activism: Motivating Activism within EdD Programs

Section

Themed - Activism

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.