An Approach to an Online EdD in Community College Leadership Program

  • Christine Harrington New Jersey City University
  • Kimberlee Hooper New Jersey City University
  • AnnMarie Hughes New Jersey City University
  • Eric Klein New Jersey City University
  • John Melendez New Jersey City University
  • Faraz Siddique New Jersey City University
  • Ellen Wasserman New Jersey City University
Keywords: online program, cohort, synchronous and asynchronous learning, curriculum

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide an example of how an EdD in Community College Leadership program is offered in an online format. First, the benefits of online programs, including increased access and flexibility for working professionals and higher levels of diversity among the student body are discussed. Then, several strategies to promote connection among students and to facilitate a supportive, engaging learning environment virtually are shared.  For example, the value of using a cohort model, a carefully designed curriculum with assignments that have practical value, and a balance of synchronous and asynchronous learning activities is described.  Finally, the important role of and strategies for incorporating models and mentors into an online doctoral program are discussed.

Author Biographies

Christine Harrington, New Jersey City University
Associate Professor, Community College Leadership
Kimberlee Hooper, New Jersey City University
Ed.D. Student, Community College Leadership
AnnMarie Hughes, New Jersey City University
Ed.D. Student, Community College Leadership
Eric Klein, New Jersey City University
Ed.D. Student, Community College Leadership
John Melendez, New Jersey City University
Professor, Community College Leadership
Faraz Siddique, New Jersey City University
Ed.D. Student, Community College Leadership
Ellen Wasserman, New Jersey City University
Ed.D. Student, Community College Leadership

References

American Association of Community Colleges (2018). AACC competencies for community college leaders. 3rd edition. https://www.aacc.nche.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/AACC-2018-Competencies_111618_5.1.pdf

Barnett, B. G., Basom, M. R., Yerkes, D. M., & Norris, C. J. (2000). Cohorts in educational leadership programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 255.

Berry, S. (2017). Student support networks in online doctoral programs: Exploring nested communities. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 33–48.

Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) (n.d.). The CPED framework. https://cped.memberclicks.net/the-framework

Cohen, J.B., Gammel, J.A. and Rutstein-Riley, A. (2016). Learning like adults: A hybrid interdisciplinary doctoral program for mid-career professionals. Emerging Directions in Doctoral Education. Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning. 6, 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120160000006032

Dembicki, M. (2018, March 8). Not as diverse as they should be. Community College Daily. https://www.ccdaily.com/2018/03/not-as-diverse-as-it-should-be/

Gaskell, A., & Mills, P. (2014). The quality and reputation of open, distance, and e-learning: What are the challenges? Open learning. The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning, 29, 190–205.

Hermond, D., & Tanner, T. (2020). Mastering critical thinking competencies in online graduate

classes. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 10(1), 47-58. DOI:10.5929/2020.10.1.4

Kezar, A. J., Drivalas, Y., & Kitchen, J. (2018). Envisioning public scholarship for our time : Models for higher education researchers. Stylus Publishing.

Lea, Mary R. (2004). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739–756.

Lieberman, M. (2018, April 25). Online students don’t have to work solo. Inside Higher Ed.https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2018/04/25/group-projects-online-classes-create-connections-and-challenge

Lovitts, B., and C. Nelson. 2000. The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from Ph.D. programs. Academe 86, (6): 44–50.

Nimer, M. (2009). The Doctoral cohort model: Increasing opportunities for success. College Student Journal, 43(4), 1373–1379.

O’Keefe, L., Rafferty, J., Gunder, A., Vignare, K. (2020, May 18). Delivering high-quality instruction online in response to COVID-19: Faculty playbook. Every Learner Everywhere. http://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources

Peralta Community College District. (2020). Describing the Peralta equity rubric. Peralta Community College District. https://web.peralta.edu/de/files/2020/10/Describing-the-Peralta-Equity-Rubric_Oct-2020.pdf

Perez, R. J., Robbins, C. K., Harris, L. W., & Montgomery, C. (2020). Exploring graduate students' socialization to equity, diversity, and inclusion. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(2), 133-145. doi: 10.1037/dhe0000115

Sankaran, S. R., & Bui, T. (2000). Impact of learning strategies and motivation on performance: A study in web-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(3), 191-198,

Smith, D. L., & Lovat, T. J. (2003). Curriculum: Action on reflection (4th ed.). Tuggerah: Social Science Press.

Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning, A review of the literature. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23-32.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Expanded 2nd edition. Pearson.

Published
2021-07-30
How to Cite
Harrington, C., Hooper, K., Hughes, A., Klein, E., Melendez, J., Siddique, F., & Wasserman, E. (2021). An Approach to an Online EdD in Community College Leadership Program. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(3), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.185
Section
Themed - Online EdD