The Group-Based Dissertation in Practice: A Journey Worth Taking




dissertation in practice, educational doctorate, group dynamics, problems of practice, small group development


This personal reflective essay explores a group Dissertation in Practice (DiP) model and process used in a localized Doctor of Education program. It describes and recommends this team-based DiP approach as an innovation that prepares practitioners to tackle complex problems of practice by focusing on a process centered around group dynamics that requires collaboration, advanced dialectical activity, engagement of stakeholders, and application of solutions to localized problems of practice. The framework of the exploration is based on accepted theories of small group development. Implications of this DiP approach include providing doctoral students collaborative problem-solving skills and professional capacity building. Ultimately, the model enables doctoral students, as future educators and leaders, to transform an environment predicated on teaching and learning in isolation to one of a highly functioning, effective team-based professional practice.

Author Biography

William Hamilton, Augusta University

Augusta University

College of Nursing

Assistant Professor


Augusta University College of Education [AUCOE]. (2021). Doctorate of education (Ed.D.) in educational innovation. Augusta University College of Education. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from

CPED (2021). #CPED20 annual and virtual convening. CPED. Retrieved August 3, 2021 from

CPED (2021A). The CPED framework. CPED. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from

Guttenberg, J. (2020). Group development model and Lean Six Sigma project team outcomes. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(4), 635-661.

Kennedy, B., Altman, M., & Pizano, A. (2018). Engaging in the battle of the snails by challenging the traditional dissertation model. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 3(1).

Kiweewa, J., Gilbride, D., Luke, M., & Clingerman, T. (2018). Tracking growth factors in experiential training groups through Tuckman’s conceptual model. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 43(3), 274-296.

Rickards, T. & Moger, S. (2000). Creative leadership processes in project team development: An alternative to Tuckman’s stage model. British Journal of Management,11(4), 273-83. https://10.1111/1467-8551.00173

Rittel, H. & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.

Spencer, H. (1860). What knowledge is of most worth? In H. Spencer (Ed.), Education: Intellectual, moral, and physical (pp. 21-96). D Appleton & Company.

Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399.

Tuckman, B. and Jensen, M. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Management, 2(4), 419-427.




How to Cite

Hamilton, W. (2022). The Group-Based Dissertation in Practice: A Journey Worth Taking. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 7(1), 42–46.