Mapping AECT Standards Framework
Implications for Instructional Technology programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.461Keywords:
assessment, competency, curriculum mapping, professional standardsAbstract
Program alignment with professional standards ensures that students gain competency-based skills that can be transferred to the workplace environment. Employers continue to place a greater value on these skills. Establishing curriculum alignment with professional standards can assist with annual program evaluations, student learning outcomes, and competencies. This article focuses on aligning a graduate-level Instructional Technology program curriculum with the professional standards of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT). Provus’ Discrepancy Evaluation model was implemented to identify gaps and adjustments to the program curriculum. The program evaluation assisted in identifying areas where the curriculum needed to be updated, coherence and organization needed to be adjusted in the program, and students and key stakeholders needed to be addressed. The recommendations and suggestions provided in this study can assist other programs in planning and implementing similar alignment processes, thereby contributing to the advancement of the understanding of assessment and evaluation practices in higher education.
References
AECT (Association for Educational Communications and Technology) (2012). AECT standards. https://www.aect.org/ docs/AECTstandards2012.pdf
AECT (Association for Educational Communications and Technology) (2024, June). AECT definition. https://www.aect.org/aect/about/aect-definition
Altmiller, G. (2023). Curriculum mapping for competency-based education: Collecting objective data. Nurse Educator, 48(5), 287. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001462
Ambida, R. S., & Cruz, R. A. (2017). Extent of compliance of a higher education institution for a university system. Science Journal of Education, 5(3), 90–99.
Arrington, T. L., & Darabi, A. (2018). Indicators of exemplary programs in instructional design and technology: Faculty and student perspectives. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 173–189.
Bazrafshan, A., Haghdoost, A., Rezaie, H., & Beigzadeh, A. (2014). A practical framework for evaluating health services management educational program: The application of the mixed-method sequential explanatory design. Research and Development in Medical Education, 4(1), 47–54.
Bharvad, A. J. (2010). Curriculum evaluation. International Research Journal, 1(12), 72–74.
Bulkani, B., Andi, S. M., & Wahidah, W. (2022). The discrepancy evaluation model in implementation of online learning (on the basis of parents' perceptions). Образование и наука, 24(2), 116–137.
Clements, M. D., & Cord, B. A. (2013). Assessment guiding learning: Developing graduate qualities in an experiential learning programme. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 114–124.
Earle, R. (2000). AECT and NCATE: A partnership for quality teaching through accreditation. TechTrends, 44(3), 53–57.
Finney, S. J., & Horst, S. J. (2019). Standards, standards, standards: Mapping professional standards for outcomes assessment to assessment practice. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 56(3), 310–325.
Fong, J., Halfond, J., & Schroeder, R. (2017). The changing landscape for professional and continuing education in the US. Center for Research and Strategy, UPCEA. https://upcea.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/The-Changing-Landscape-for-Professional-and-Continuing-Education-in-the-U.S.whitepaper.feb17.v2.pdf
Gashi, L. (2021). Intercultural awareness through English language teaching: The case of Kosovo. Interchange, 52(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09441-5
Gottipati, S., & Shankararaman, V. (2018). Competency analytics tool: Analyzing curriculum using course competencies. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 41–60.
Hale, J. A. (2008). A guide to curriculum mapping: Planning, implementing, and sustaining the process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Harden, R. M. (2001). AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: A tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, 23(2), 123–137.
Henri, M., Johnson, M. D., & Nepal, B. (2017). A review of competency-based learning: Tools, assessments, and recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 607–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20180
Holmes, D. W., Sheehan, M., Birks, M., & Smithson, J. (2018). Development of a competency mapping tool for undergraduate professional degree programmes, using mechanical engineering as a case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(1), 126–143.
Howard, C. D., & Benedicks, R. (2020). An industry liaison for graduate learning in instructional design. TechTrends, 64(3), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00465-4
Jacobs H. H., & Johnson, A. W. (2009). The curriculum mapping planner: Templates, tools and resources. Alexandria, VA: ASCD
James, N. M., & LaDue, N. D. (2021). Pedagogical reform in an introductory chemistry course and the importance of curricular alignment. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(11), 3421–3430. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00688
Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (Eds.) (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kapadia, S. J., & Al-Nusair, L. (2022). Basis, process and outcomes of a student involvement project for curriculum review at the imperial college school of medicine. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 10(3), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.30476/JAMP.2022.94921.1613
Khailova, L. (2021). Using curriculum mapping to scaffold and equitably distribute information literacy instruction for graduate professional studies programs. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102281.
Kopera-Frye, K., Mahaffy, J., & Svare, G. M. (2008). The map to curriculum alignment and improvement. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 1, 8–14.
Lam, B. H. & Tsui, K. T. (2016). Curriculum mapping as deliberation – examining the alignment of subject learning outcomes and course curricula. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1371–1388.
Larson, M. B. (2005///Nov/Dec). Instructional Design Career Environments: Survey of the Alignment of Preparation and Practice. TechTrends, 49(6), 22–32,68. https://www-proquest-com.liblink.uncw.edu/scholarly-journals/instructional-design-career-environments-survey/docview/223125361/se-2
Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2004). Instructional design practice: Career environments, job roles, and a cllimate of change. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 17(1), 22–40. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/instructional-design-practice-career-environments/docview/218518692/se-2
Lawson, R., Taylor, T., French, E., Fallshaw, E., Hall, C., Kinash, S., & Summers, J. (2013). Hunters & Gatherers: Strategies for Curriculum Mapping and Data Collection for Assurance of Learning. OLT Project Report, Sydney.
Leathwood, C., & Phillips, D. (2000). Developing curriculum evaluation research in higher education: Process, politics and practicalities. Higher Education, 40(3), 313–330.
Makanya, J. (2019). Curriculum evaluation: A critical analysis. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(5), 1–7.
Maratovna, S. D., Nurlanbekovna, U. A., Ismailbekovna, S. L., Askarovna, B. L., Armysovna, K. N., & Yuryevna, S. E. (2021). Criteria of subjectivity of master's students instructional technology and education degree program. World Journal on Educational Technology, 13(3), 419. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i3.5950
Mardis, M. A., Ma, J., Jones, F. R., Ambavarapu, C. R., Kelleher, H. M., Spears, L. I., & McClure, C. R. (2018). Assessing alignment between information technology educational opportunities, professional requirements, and industry demands. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1547–1584.
McDavid, J. C., Huse, I, & Hawthorn, L. R., L. (2019). Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practices (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Kemp, J. E. (2007). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.
Oliver, B., Jones, S., Ferns, S., & Tucker, B. (2007). Mapping curricula: Ensuring work-ready graduates by mapping course learning outcomes and higher order thinking skills. In Southwell, D (Ed.) ATN Evaluation and Assessment Conference. (pp. 103-109). Department of Teaching and Learning Support Services, QUT, Australia. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/12576/1/12576.pdf.
Perera, S., & Pearson, J. (2013). RICS professional competency mapping framework for programme appraisal and benchmarking, RICS Research Trust funded research Main Report, RICS. http://www.rics.org/uk/knowledge/research/researchreports/professional-competency-mapping-framework/
Richardson, J. C., Brush, T., Ottenbreit-Leftwich Anne, Karlin, M., Leary, H., Shelton, B. E., Lowell, V., Exter, M. E., Jesse, S., & Shin, S. (2020). Innovations in Instructional Design and Technology Programs: a View from PIDT 2018. TechTrends, 64(3), 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00445-8.
Richey, R. C., Silber, K. H., & Ely, D. P. (2008). Reflections on the 2008 AECT Definitions of the Field. TechTrends, 52(1), 24–25.
Schwab, K., & Zahidi, S. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum, October 2020. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf
Seels, B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Redefining the field: A collaborative effort. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 39(2), 36–38.
Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (2012). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. IAP.
Siyam, N., & Hussain, M. (2022). Academic Staff’s attitudes towards a curriculum mapping tool. TechTrends, 66(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00650-4
Stavredes, T., & Herder, T. (2014). A guide to online course design: Strategies for student success. John Wiley & Sons.
Sumsion, J., and Goodfellow, J. (2004). Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: A critical evaluation. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 329–346.
Tan, Y. L., Nakata, K., & Paul, D. (2018). Aligning IS masters programs with industry. Journal of Information Systems Education, 29(3), 169–182.
Uysal, F. (2022). Accreditation through the eyes of program evaluation. In E. Hysa & R. Foote (Eds.), New perspectives on using accreditation to improve higher education (pp.1-25). IGI Global.
Wallace, M. P., & Ke, H. (2023). Examining the content alignment between language curriculum and a language test in China. TEFLIN Journal, 34(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i1/116-135
Wang, C.-L. (2015) Mapping or tracing? Rethinking curriculum mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1550–1559.
Watson, E. G., Steketee, C., Mansfield, K. J., Moore, M., Dalziel, B., Damodaran, A., Walker, B., Duvivier, R., & Hu, W. (2020). Curriculum mapping for health professions education: A typology. Focus on Health Professional Education. A Multi-Professional Journal, 21(1), 91–113.
Wright, E. A., Brown, B., Getting, J., Martello, J. L., McClendon, K. S., Smith, K. M., Teeters, J., Ulbrich, T. R., Wegrzyn, N., & Bradley-Baker, L. R. (2014). Teaching and learning curriculum programs: Recommendations for postgraduate pharmacy experiences in education. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 71(15), 1292–1302. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp130657
Yalçın, Y., Ursavaş, Ö. F., & Klein, J. D. (2021). Measuring instructional design competencies of future professionals: Construct validity of the ibstpi® standards. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1701–1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10006-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Daisyane Barreto, Sheri Conklin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
