Fostering Student Success Through Effective Mentorship
Insights from Award-Winning Education Doctorate Dissertations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.488Keywords:
doctoral mentoring, EdD, culture of care, feedback, academic writing supportAbstract
This qualitative study explored the mentoring relationship between EdD students and their dissertation chairs who won the CPED Dissertation in Practice of the Year Award. Utilizing the CPED Mentoring and Advising Skills to frame the study, we interviewed 16 mentees and mentors. Thematic analysis pointed to broad mentorship themes of creating a culture of care, providing meaningful feedback, and modeling writing as a genre. This study has implications for practice for faculty chairing dissertation in practice, students, and doctoral program administrators.
References
Al Makhamreh, M., & Stockley, D. (2020). Mentorship and well-being: Examining doctoral students’ lived experiences in doctoral supervision context. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2019-0013
Baker, V.L., Pifer, M.J., & Flemion, B. (2013). Process challenges and learning-based interaction in stage 2 of doctoral education: Implications from two applied social science fields. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 449–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2013.11777298
Brown, R. D., Geesa, R. L., & McConnel, K. R. (2020). Creating, implementing, and redefining a conceptual framework for mentoring pathways for education doctorate students. Higher Learning Research Communications, 10(2), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v10i2.1188
Capello, S. (2020). Leveraging PhD Students to Support EdD Dissertation Writing. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 5(3), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2020.110
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (2024). The CPED Framework. https://www.cpedinitiative.org/the-framework
Creighton, L., Creighton, T., & Parks, D. (2010). Mentoring to degree completion: expanding the horizons of doctoral proteges. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnerships in Learning, 18(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260903448342
Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2
Cruz, J., Goff, M. H., & Marsh, J. P. (2020). Building the mentoring relationship: humanism and the importance of storytelling between mentor and mentee. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(2), 104–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2020.1749344
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
Eby, L. T., Rhodes, J. E., & Allen, T. D. (2007). Definition and evolution of mentoring. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (7–20). John Wiley & Sons.
Esposito, J., Lee, T., Limes-Taylor Henderson, K., Mason, A., Outler, A., Rodriguez Jackson, J., & Whitaker-Lea, L. (2017). Doctoral students' experiences with pedagogies of the home, pedagogies of love, and mentoring in the academy. Educational Studies, 53(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1286589
Eyres, S. J., Hatch, D. H., Turner, S. B., & West, M. (2001). Doctoral students' responses to writing critique: Messages for teachers. Journal of Nursing Education, 40(4), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-20010401-04
Geesa R. L., Lowery K., McConnell K. (2018). Mentee perspectives of a first-year peer mentoring program for educational doctoral (EdD) students. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 471–495. https://doi.org/10.28945/4148
Geesa, R. L., McConnell, K. R., Elam, N. P., & Clark, E. (2020). Mentor support systems in a doctoral mentoring program. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 11(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-10-2019-0081
Geesa, R. L., McConnell, K. R., & Brown, R. D. (2022). Mentorship for doctor of education candidates: Exploring sustainability, networking, and expected outcomes within a mentoring program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 17(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751211013853
Hauth, C., Crystle, J., Melideo, S. L., Boyd, R., & Thompson, J. (2024). Humanizing the online doctoral experience with high-impact faculty engagement and mentorship. In Humanizing online teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 67-90). IGI Global.
Inouye, K., & McAlpine, L. (2019). Developing academic identity: A review of the literature on doctoral writing and feedback. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.28945/4168
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J. and Gisle, L. (2017), Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students, Research Policy, 46(4), 868–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
Lowery K., Geesa R., McConnell K. (2018). Designing a peer mentoring program for education doctorate (EdD) students: A literature review. Higher Learning Research Communications, 8(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v8i1.408
Lunsford, L. G., Crisp, G., Dolan, E. L., & Wuetherick, B. (2017). Mentoring in higher education. The SAGE handbook of mentoring, 20, 316-334. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402011.n20
Manathunga, C., and Goozée, J. (2007). Challenging the dual assumption of the ‘always/ already autonomous student and effective supervisor. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(3), 309–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701278658
Markos, A., & Buss, R. R. (2022). Using mentor texts to develop disciplinary literacy of scholarly practitioners through dissertations in practice. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 7(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2022.222
Martin, S. B., Gournaris, K., Jaffery, Z., Hatfield, L., Jung, S.-J., Xiang, L., Anderson, I., & Caskey, M. M. (2021). EdD graduate perspectives: Uplifting our own voices. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.124
Posselt, J. (2018). Normalizing struggle: Dimensions of faculty support for doctoral students and implications for persistence and well-being. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(6), 988–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1449080
Roberts, L., & Ferro-Almeida, S. C. (2019). Is trustworthiness important in a doctoral mentor? Toward a theory of tough love mentoring. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 613. https://doi.org/10.28945/4419
Singe, S. M., Sheldon, L., Rynkiewicz, K., Manning, C., Filep, E., Zuk, E., & Hargrave, C. (2021). Mentorship experiences of doctoral students: Understanding desired attributes of doctoral student mentors. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 19(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580X/2021.1967
Thomas, D., Lunsford, L.G., and Rodrigues, H. (2015). Early career academic staff support: evaluating mentoring networks. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 320–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1034426
Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. Simon and Schuster.
Woolderink, M., Putnik, K., van der Boom, H., & Klabbers, G. (2015). The voice of PhD candidates and PhD supervisors: A qualitative exploratory study amongst PhD candidates and supervisors to evaluate the relational aspects of PhD supervision in the Netherlands. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 217–235. https://doi.org/10.28945/2276
Yob, I., & Crawford, L. (2012). Conceptual framework for mentoring doctoral students. Higher Learning Research Communications, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v2i2.66
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rhia Moreno, Jesse L. Wood, Lee D. Flood

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.