Dangerous Dissertations

Alternative Approaches to Dissertation Inquiry

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.494

Keywords:

conceptual dissertations, critical policy analysis, critique, dissertation mentoring, alternative dissertations

Abstract

The ever-changing educational environment calls for scholars and practitioners alike to trouble the current ways of seeing and doing dissertations and to invite conversations about doing dissertations differently. Alternative dissertations serve as an avenue for this type of critical work. We begin this article by providing an overview of the different dissertation genres and formats in Appalachian State University’s (AppState) EdD program and situating the concept of a dangerous dissertation within the alternative dissertation landscape. We frame the dangerous dissertation as an alternative approach to dissertation inquiry and share our experiences creating and supporting dangerous dissertations. Specifically, we discuss the professional anxieties voiced by students using dissertations as vehicles for critiquing their professional contexts and how faculty mentors can support students grappling with shifting professional identities. We conclude with an urgent call for more dangerous dissertations and guidance for faculty advisors supporting this type of critical work.

References

Allen, A. (2014). 62 – Politics. In L. Lawlor & J. Nale (Eds.), The Cambridge Foucault Lexicon (pp. 364-369). Cambridge University Press.

Andrews, R., & Grogan, M. (2005, Spring). Form should follow function: Removing the EdD dissertation from the PhD straight jacket. UCEA Review, 46(2), 10–13.

Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Pearson Education.

Bacchi, C. & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural policy analysis. Palgrave Pivot.

Brown, S. P. (2017). Doing, undoing, and redoing collegiate athletics: Conceptual tales of marginality and mattering [Doctoral dissertation, Appalachian State University]. NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (NC DOCKS). https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/listing.aspx?styp=ti&id=21701

Burry, R., & Nava Eggett, K. (Hosts). (2021–2023). Through our lens [Audio podcast]. Apple. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/through-our-lens/id1570159943

Burry, R. and Nava Eggett, K.A. (2022). Leveraging instructional technology and asset-based pedagogy for equitable representations in technological opportunities. [Doctoral dissertation, Appalachian State University]. NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (NC DOCKS). https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/listing.aspx?id=38146

Buss, R., Zambo, R., Zambo, D., & R. Williams, T. (2014). Developing researching professionals in an EdD program: From learners and leaders to scholarly and influential practitioners. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 4(2), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-11-2013-0022

Butler, J. (1990/2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of "sex". Routledge.

Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.

Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED). (2024, June 19). The CPED framework. https://cped.memberclicks.net/the-framework

Duke, N. K., & Beck, S. W. (1999). Education should consider alternative formats for the dissertation. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 31–36.

Foucault, M. (1975/1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd ed). Vintage. Foucault, M. (1980a). Two lectures. In G. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 78–108). Vintage.

Foucault, M, (1980b). Truth and power. In G. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972-1977 (pp. 109-133). Vintage.

Foucault, M. (1984). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In P.

Rabinow (Ed.). The Foucault Reader (pp. 340-372). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1982, 1983)

Foucault, M. (1984/1997). The ethics of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Ethics, subjectivity, and truth (pp. 281-301). The New Press. (Reprinted from Concordia: Revista internacional de filosophia 6, pp. 96-116, 1984)

Foucault, M. (2001). Fearless speech (J. Pearson, Ed.). Semiotext(e).

Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.

Ma, V. W., Dana, N. F., Adams, A., & Kennedy, B. L. (2018). Understanding the problem of practice: An analysis of professional practice EdD dissertations. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 3, 13–22.

Martin, R. (1988). Truth, power, self: An interview with Foucault. In Martin et al. (Eds.), Technologies of Self (pp. 9-15). University of Massachusetts Press.

McLaren, M. A. (2002). Feminism, Foucault, and embodied subjectivity. State University of New York Press.

Miller, V., & Brown, S. (2024). Alternative formats: Thinking differently about dissertations in practice and faculty dissertation mentoring. In Everson, L. Hemmer, K. Torres, & S. R. Tamim (Eds.). The importance of the dissertation in practice (DiP): A resource guide for EdD students (pp. 205–221). Myers Education Press.

Perry, J. A. (2024). The history of the DiP: Dissertation in what? In Everson, L. Hemmer, K. Torres, & S. R. Tamim (Eds.). The importance of the dissertation in practice (DiP): A resource guide for EdD students (pp. 9–22). Myers Education Press.

Proctor, K. (2024). Problematizing institutional effectiveness: A Foucauldian poststructural policy analysis [Doctoral dissertation, Appalachian State University]. https://doi.org/10.71889/5fylantbak.29506022.v1

Shears, L. (2022). The teaching and practice of the “yoga body”: A poststructural, queercrip analysis of yoga education [Doctoral dissertation, Appalachian State University]. NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (NC DOCKS). https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/listing.aspx?styp=ti&id=38178

Spivak, G. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. Routledge.

Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Magill, R. A. (1986). A case for an alternative format for the thesis/dissertation. Quest, 38(2), 116–124. https://doiorg.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1080/00336297.1986.10483846

Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-08-04 — Updated on 2025-08-07

Versions

How to Cite

Brown, S., & Proctor, K. (2025). Dangerous Dissertations: Alternative Approaches to Dissertation Inquiry. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 10(3), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.494 (Original work published August 4, 2025)

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): The Present and Future of EdD Alternative Dissertations

Section

Themed-The Present and Future of EdD Alternative Dissertations

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Star Brown, Kristen Proctor

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.