Why CPED Needs a Philosophy in Practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.499

Keywords:

CPED Dissertation in Practice (DiP), philosophy, educational philosophy

Abstract

The authors employ a philosophical approach to model why a philosophy in practice dissertation has value in the context of EDD programs.  Through literature review and philosophical analysis, the authors interrogate binary oppositions implicit in the discussion of theory, research, and practice. The authors out what the philosophy in practice dissertation might look like and finally consider Challenges and Implications for CPED & Member Programs. 

References

Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2022). The CPED framework. https://cped.memberclicks.net/the-framework

Capello, S. (2020). Leveraging PhD students to support EdD dissertation writing. Impacting Education, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2020.110

Capello, S. (2023). Supporting EdD scholar-practitioners through the COVID-19 pandemic using an ethic of care. Impacting Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.263

Capello, S., Yurkofsky, M., & Bonney, E. N. (2023). Part One of the themed issue on reimagining research methods coursework for the preparation of scholar-practitioners. Impacting Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.368

Cauthen, Michael

Chua, S. M. J. (2018). Thinking the normative in the EdD. London Review of Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.1.06

DeMartino, L., & Gardner Renn, D. (2023). Honor, build, and restructure: Preparing transformative school leaders as equitable changemakers through doctoral research methods courses. Impacting Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.364

Diller, A. (1996). The ethics of care and education: A new paradigm. In A. Diller, B. Houston,

K. P. Morgan, & M. Ayim (Eds.), The Gender Question in Education: Theory, pedagogy, and politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Ezzani, M. D., & Paufler, N. A. (2018). Doctoral program in education leadership redesign: Utilizing a multicriteria framework. Impacting Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2018.70

Fertman, C. I. (2018). Facilitating and supporting EdD students’ scholar-practitioner writing as an epistemological tool. Impacting Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2018.87

Fletcher, S. (2000). Education and emancipation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Flood, L. D. (2024). Centering the scholarly practitioner within the EdD: Lessons learned. Impacting Education, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2024.369

Foster, H. A., Chesnut, S., Thomas, J., & Robinson, C. (2023). Differentiating the EdD and the PhD in higher education: A survey of characteristics and trends. Impacting Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.288

Friend, J., & Militello, M. (2015). Lights, camera, action: Advancing learning, research, and program evaluation through video production in educational leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(2), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775114561120

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gutmann, A. (1987, 1999). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hash, P. (2022). ARTful design: Disruptions within the dissertation in practice. Impacting Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2022.229

Hawkins, J., & Martens, M. L. (2021). The Improvement Science Dissertation in Practice: Book review. Impacting Education, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.182

Hooser, A., Evert, K., & Krahenbuhl, K. (2023). Reimagining research courses for scholar practitioners: Rejecting methodological binaries. Impacting Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.334

Howe, Kenneth (1997). Understanding Equal Educational Opportunity." Social Justice, Democracy, and Schooling. Advances in Contemporary Educational Thought, Volume 20. Teachers College Press.

Hurst, H. (2023). Applying theory and research to practice: The pedagogies practices. Impacting Education, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.358

Keller, E. F. (1997). Developmental Biology as a Feminist Cause? Osiris, 12, 16–28.

Kennedy, B. L., Altman, M., & Pizano, A. (2018). Engaging in the Battle of the Snails by Challenging the Traditional Dissertation Model. Impacting Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2018.27

Kleinman, S. S. (1998). Overview of Feminist Perspectives on the Ideology of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(8), 837–834.

Kochhar-Bryant, C. A. (2017). Symbiotic Space: Exploring the Nexus of Rigor, Problems of Practice and Implementation. Impacting Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2017.25

Kramer, A. M. (2022). Clearing the Clouds: Finding Motivation and Clarity in a Non-Traditional Dissertation Using Arts-Based Educational Research (ABER). Impacting Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2022.228

Lee-Johnson, Y. L., O’Connor, K., Ono, J., Fair, K., Rodney, T., & Dixon, T. (2023). Reflexivity for restorying the ontological and epistemological truths in qualitative research. Impacting Education, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.339

Ma, V. W., Dana, N. F., Adams, A., & Kennedy, B. L. (2018). Understanding the problem of practice: An analysis of professional practice EdD dissertations. Impacting Education, 3.https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2018.50

Noddings, N. (1999). Care, justice, and equity. In M. S. Katz, N. Noddings, & K. A. Strike (Eds.), Justice and caring (pp. 12-XX). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Noddings, N. (2006). Critical lessons: What our schools should teach. Cambridge University Press.

Noddings, N. (2015). The challenge to care in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Paufler, N. A. (2023). Preparing scholarly practitioners to use improvement science: A systematic, iterative, and reflective approach to teaching applied quantitative research methods. Impacting Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.336

Peña Alfaro, I. (2023, March 15). The future of the Ed.D. degree—and how it will change over time. Fortune Education. https://fortune.com/education/articles/the-future-of-the-ed-d-degree-and-how-it-will-change-over-time/

Perry, J. A. (2015, March). The EdD and scholarly practitioners: A national consortium sees the combination of applied research and practical theory as a tool worthy of the superintendency. School Administrator.

Perry, J. A., Zambo, D., & Crow, R. (2020). The Improvement Science Dissertation in Practice: A Guide for Faculty, Committee Members, and their Students. Myers Education Press.

Shaw, L. F., Paré-Blagoev, J., & Quaynor, L. (2024). Reimagining the EdD in a time when the future of public schooling is at stake. Impacting Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2024.399

Sroka, M. J. (2021). Collecting dissertation data during COVID-19. Impacting Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.166

Stitzlein, S.M. (2015) Teaching for Dissent: Citizenship Education and Political Activism. Routledge

Stitzlein, S. M. (2019). Learning how to hope: Reviving democracy through our schools and civil society. Oxford University Press.

Stitzlein, S. M. (2024). Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era: Emphasizing Truth in the Education of Citizens. Oxford University Press.

Walsh, A. (2020). On the necessarily non-empirical nature of political philosophy (or why political philosophy is not a sub-discipline of political science). Australian Journal of Political Science, 55(4), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2020.1822775

Downloads

Published

2025-08-01

How to Cite

Nelsen, P., & Thomas-Reid, M. (2025). Why CPED Needs a Philosophy in Practice. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 10(3), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.499

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): The Present and Future of EdD Alternative Dissertations

Section

Themed-The Present and Future of EdD Alternative Dissertations

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Peter J. Nelsen, Matthew Thomas-Reid

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.