It Is Harder to Generate Alternative Dissertations Than It Looks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.505Keywords:
alternative dissertation, dissertation-in-practice, Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED)Abstract
This study examines 39 education doctorate (EdD) dissertations that were completed by members of five cohorts of EdD students from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln’s (UNL) Department of Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education (TLTE) to consider what constitutes an alternative dissertation. All of the dissertation authors began their EdD studies after UNL began its affiliation with the Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED). After pondering what makes an EdD dissertation “alternative”, the article notes both that most of the dissertations remain traditional (i.e., structurally like doctorate of philosophy [PhD] dissertations) and that all of the advising faculty are PhD-holders. The article does offer accounts of two dissertations, however, that seem to encapsulate well the spirit and rationale for alternative dissertations or dissertations in practice (DiPs).
References
Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H (2005). Extending educational reform: From one school to many. Routledge.
Hamann, E. T., (2003). Reflections on the field: Imagining the future of the anthropology of education if we take Laura Nader seriously. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 34(4): 438–449.
Hamann, E. T., & Malone, S. (2020). The equity and engagement challenges of teaching reading in middle school. Midwest and Plains Equity Assistance Center.
Hamann, E. T., & Reeves, J. (2012). Accessing high-quality instructional strategies. In T. Timar & J. Maxwell-Jolly (Eds.), Narrowing the achievement gap: Perspectives and strategies for challenging times (pp. 95-110). Harvard Education Press.
Hamann, E. T. & Trainin, G. (2018). Problems of practice as stance. Impacting Education 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2018.74
Kramer, A. M., (2021) Considering student voices in Reading Intervention: Reconceptualizing and rethinking possibilities for high school reading through arts-based educational research. ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. AAI28489940. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI28489940
Kramer, A. M., (2022). Clearing the clouds: Finding motivation and clarity in a non-traditional dissertation using arts-based educational research (ABER). Impacting Education 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2022.228
Latta, M., & Wunder, S. (Eds.) (2012). Placing practitioner knowledge at the center of teacher education: Rethinking the policy and practice of the education doctorate. Information Age Publishing.
Lortie, D. (1975). School teacher: A sociological inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
McDermott, R. P. (1977). Social relations as contexts for learning in school. Harvard Educational Review, 47(2): 199–213.
McGowan, T. M., & Pederson, J. E., (2012). No longer a ‘PhD lite’: Establishing a professional practice doctorate of substance. In M. M. Latta & S. Wunder (Eds.) Placing practitioner knowledge at the center of teacher education: Rethinking the policy and practice of the education doctorate, (pp. 233-248). Information Age Press.
Mead, M. (1961). Questions that need asking. Teachers College Record, 63(2), 89–93.
Mehta, J. D., Gomez, L. M., & Bryk, A. S. (2011). Schooling as a knowledge profession. Education Week, (March 28) https://www.edweek.org/leadership/opinion-schooling-as-a-knowledge-profession/2011/03
Mumm, N. (2022). I hate wrestling, But I go to wrestling: Exploring teachers’ decisions to stay in rural Nebraska public schools. ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. AAI29256541. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI29256541
Nader, L. (Ed.) (1996). Naked science: Anthropological inquiry into boundaries, power, and knowledge. Routledge.
Perry, J. A. (2012). What history reveals about the education doctorate. In M. M. Latta & S. Wunder (Eds.) Placing practitioner knowledge at the center of teacher education: Rethinking the policy and practice of the education doctorate, (pp. 51-73). Information Age Press.
Perry, J. A. (2013). Introduction. In J. A. Perry & D. L. Carlson (Eds.) In their own words: A journey to the stewardship of practice in education, (pp. 1-14). Information Age Publishing.
Perry, J.A., Zambo, D., & Abruzzo, E. (2020b). Faculty leaders’ challenges and strategies in redesigning EdD programs. Impacting Education 5. doi10.5195/ie.2020.143
Perry, J.A., Zambo, D., & Crow, R., (2020a). The improvement science dissertation in practice. Myers Education Press.
Scheinost, L. (2021). Considering gentle teaching and equitable reading practices." ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. AAI28419739. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI28419739
Seidel, T. & Shavelson, R., (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499.
Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Conklin Bueschel, A., & Garabedian, K. J., (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25–32.
Yang, P. (2022). There is nothing I would rather do: Exploring teachers’ decisions to stay in urban Nebraska public schools. ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. AAI29257572. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI29257572
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Edmund T. Hamann, Laura Boche

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.