Catherine D’ignazio And Lauren F. Klein: Data Feminism
Book Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2026.526Keywords:
critical quantitative methods, data feminism, research methods curriculumAbstract
This book review examines Data Feminism by Catherine D’Ignazio and Lauren F. Klein, a transformative text that challenges traditional notions of neutrality and objectivity in quantitative research. Grounded in intersectional feminist theory, the book presents seven principles of data feminism that call for examining and challenging power structures, valuing emotion, rethinking binaries, embracing pluralism, situating data within context and making labor visible. For Ed.D. programs committed to equity and social justice, Data Feminism offers a critical framework for reimagining research methods curricula, equipping scholar-practitioners to interrogate power, embrace reflexivity, and foster more inclusive and just data practices.
References
Arellano, L. (2022). Questioning the science: How quantitative methodologies perpetuate inequity in higher education. Education Sciences, 12(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020116
Baker, C. A. (2019). A QuantCrit approach: Using critical race theory as a means to evaluate if Rate My Professor assessments are racially biased. Journal of Underrepresented and Minority Progress, 3(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.32674/jump.v3i1.1012
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2021). The CPED Framework. https://www.cpedinitiative.org/the-framework
D’Ignazio, C. & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001
López, N., Erwin, C., Binder, M., & Chavez, M. J. (2017). Making the invisible visible: Advancing quantitative methods in higher education using critical race theory and intersectionality. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1375185
Oakley, A. (1998). Gender, methodology and people’s ways of knowing: Some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology, 32(4), 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038598032004005
Spivak, G. C. (2010). “Can the Subaltern Speak?”: Revised edition, from the “history” chapter of critique of postcolonial reason. In R. C. Morris (Ed.), Can the subaltern speak?: Reflections on the history of an idea (pp. 21–78). Columbia University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/morr14384.5
Stage, F., & Wells, R. (2014). Critical quantitative inquiry in context. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2013(158), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20041
Strunk, K. K., & Hoover, P. D. (2019). Quantitative methods for social justice and equity: Theoretical and practical considerations. In K. K. Strunk, & L. A. Locke (Eds.), Research methods for social justice and equity in education (pp. 191–201). Palgrave Macmillian.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Seniz Celimli-Aksoy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
