An Argument for Practice Reviews in the Professional Education Doctorate

Authors

  • Tiffany-Rose Sikorski The George Washington University
  • Xinxin Wang The George Washington University https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2960-5006
  • Tasha Williams Friendship Collegiate Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2026.557

Keywords:

literature review, wisdom of practice, practitioner literature

Abstract

This essay proposes the practice review as a potentially important component of the professional education doctorate (EdD). First, a rationale for the practice review is provided, grounded in the Carnegie Project for the Education Doctorate’s conceptualization of the professional doctorate. Next, examples of practice reviews are presented to demonstrate their potential utility in learning to conduct research centered on problems of practice. Finally, examples from other disciplines highlight areas for future development of the practice review within the professional education doctorate.

References

Brown, J. C., & Joyce, M. C. (2024). The emphasis on multicultural science instruction in NSTA Science Scope and the Science Teacher journals. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 35(1), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2023.2181506

Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2022). The CPED Framework. Retrieved September 29, 2025 from https://www.cpedinitiative.org/assets/docs/cped_framework.pdf

Dill, D. D., & Morrison, J. L. (1985). EdD and PhD research training in the field of higher education: A survey and a proposal. The Review of Higher Education, 8(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1985.0027

Falk, J. H., Storksdieck, M., & Dierking, L. D. (2007). Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506064

Feldman, A. (1997). Varieties of wisdom in the practice of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(7), 757–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00021-8

Firestone, W. A., Perry, J. A., Leland, A. S., & McKeon, R. T. (2019). Teaching research and data use in the education doctorate. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 16(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775119872231

Kumar, S., & Dawson, K. (2013). Exploring the impact of a professional practice education doctorate in educational environments. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.736380

Leach, L. F., Baker, C., Leamons, C. G., Bunch, P., & Brock, J. (2021). Using evidence to frame problems of practice. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.144

Perry, J. A. (2012). “To Ed.D. or not to Ed.D.?”. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(1), 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400108

Perry, J. A., & Imig, D. G. (2008). A stewardship of practice in education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(6), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.6.42-49

Puttick, G., Drayton, B., & Cohen, E. (2015). A study of the literature on lab-based instruction in biology. The American Biology Teacher, 77(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2015.77.1.3

Rowe, S., & Nickels, A. (2011). Visitor motivations across three informal education institutions: An application of the identity-related visitor motivation model. Visitor Studies, 14(2), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2011.608006

Ruffini, P. B. (2020). Conceptualizing science diplomacy in the practitioner-driven literature: a critical review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00609-5

Shulman, L. S. (2007). Response to comments: Practical wisdom in the service of professional practice. Educational Researcher, 36(9), 560–563. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X0731315

Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. M., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education's doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X0350030

Taber, K. S. (2013). Action research and the academy: Seeking to legitimise a ‘different’ form of research. Teacher Development, 17(2), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2013.793060

Yemini, M., Engel, L., & Ben Simon, A. (2025). Place-based education–a systematic review of literature. Educational Review, 77(2), 640–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2177260

Downloads

Published

2026-07-29

How to Cite

Sikorski, T.-R., Wang, X., & Williams, T. (2026). An Argument for Practice Reviews in the Professional Education Doctorate . Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 11(3), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2026.557

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2026): Regular Issue

Section

Essays

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Tiffany-Rose Sikorski, Xinxin Wang, Tasha Williams

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.