The Authenticity and Promise of Learner Talk in Programmatic Self-Study

Authors

  • Melissa Parenti Northeastern University
  • Cherese Childers-McKee Northeastern University
  • Tyneka Holley Northeastern University
  • Annine Crystal Northeastern University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2026.637

Keywords:

curricular design, EdD, formative assessment, social justice, scholar identity

Abstract

Formative assessment plays an essential role in programmatic curricular design. Six years following a comprehensive program redesign, we sought student and alumni voice to capture the degree to which the program aligned with the Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) guiding principles and successfully prepared Scholarly Practitioners. Twenty-one participants — 12 current students and 9 alumni — engaged in two student and two alumni focus groups during Fall 2024. Using a two-cycle qualitative coding process, five themes emerged from the data: social justice as embedded yet emergent, theory to practice, field-based practice, professional identity transformation, and alumni and student variance in program perception. Findings revealed a strong action research-based methodology-to-practice, evidence of professional identity transformation across participants, and a developmental latency between enrollment and full recognition of program impact. The CPED Principles Implementation & Framework© Impact Self-Study Project process highlighted several areas of program strength and helped identify areas for programmatic improvement specific to strengthening student articulation of theoretical grounding and structural gaps between core and concentration coursework.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.

Bradbury, L. U., & Campbell, E. (2024). Learned from a semester spent in schools. Studying Teacher Education, 20(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2023.2298818

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Rand McNally.

Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (2014). The Sage encyclopedia of action research. SAGE.

Cronin, E. H. (2025). Becoming an education activist through the action research dissertation: From ideas to action. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 10(4), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.579

Karalis Noel, T., & Gorlewski, J. (2025). Cultivating change agents through effective program evaluation. Impacting Education, 10(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.451

Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–33.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602.

Solórzano, D., & Yosso, T. (2001). Critical race and LatCrit theory and method: Counterstorytelling Chicana and Chicano graduate school experiences. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(4), 471–495.

Stringer, E. T., & Aragon, A. O. (2021). Action research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. University of Michigan Business School.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-22

How to Cite

Parenti, M., Childers-McKee, C., Holley, T., & Crystal, A. (2026). The Authenticity and Promise of Learner Talk in Programmatic Self-Study . Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 11(4), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2026.637

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2026): Themed-CPED Programs Self-Study

Section

Themed-CPED Programs Self-Study

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Melissa Parenti, Cherese Childers-McKee, Tyneka Holley, Annine Crystal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.