Using the CPED Rubrics for Program Self-Study

Confirmation and Challenge

Authors

  • Sarah A. Capello Radford University
  • Maxwell M. Yurkofsky Radford University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2026.639

Keywords:

CPED, EdD, education doctorate, self-study

Abstract

This essay details the process, results, and implications of a self-study project that the Education Doctorate (EdD) program faculty at Radford University undertook as part of their engagement in the Carnegie Project of the Education Doctorate (CPED) Principles Implementation & Framework© Impact Self-Study Project. Radford University is a regional comprehensive institution located in the Southeast that has a relatively new EdD program. We believed that embarking in a formalized self-study project could serve as a useful benchmark check-in for us to assess our program progress, alignment to our core goals, vision, and mission, and serve our aim of engaging in continuous program improvement. For the self-study, we reviewed program documents and student artifacts and conducted focus groups with faculty and students. We coded the data according to the CPED framework principles and scored our program according to the CPED rubrics. The results confirmed that we were making desired progress but also illuminated growth areas.

Author Biography

Sarah A. Capello, Radford University

Assistant Professor

School of Teacher Education and Leadership

 

References

Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How American’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.

Capello, S. A., Bonney, E. N., & Yurkofsky, M. (2023). The practitioner inquiry course sequence: Centering improvement science in the design of an EdD program. In C. Benedetti & A. Covarrubias (Eds.), Teaching critical inquiry and applied research in Ed.D. programs: Moving beyond traditional methods (pp. 121-134). Myers Education Press.

Hinnant-Crawford, B. N. (2025). Improvement science in education: A primer (2nd ed.). Myers Education Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-22

How to Cite

Capello, S. A., & Yurkofsky, M. M. (2026). Using the CPED Rubrics for Program Self-Study: Confirmation and Challenge . Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 11(4), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2026.639

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2026): Themed-CPED Programs Self-Study

Section

Themed-CPED Programs Self-Study

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Sarah A. Capello, Maxwell M. Yurkofsky

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.