Making Commitments Visible

A Self-Study of CPED Enactment in an EdD Program

Authors

  • Amy Markos Arizona State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2026.640

Keywords:

self-study, program improvement, espoused theory, theory-in-use, CPED framework

Abstract

Doctor of Education programs often articulate guiding commitments through mission statements, program values, and, for Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) member institutions, the CPED Framework©. Yet, the presence of commitments in program routines and practices does not guarantee that they remain visible in a program's everyday experiences. This study examined how CPED principles and design concepts were embedded, enacted, and made visible within the Leadership and Innovation EdD program at Arizona State University, a founding CPED member institution. Using a self-study design, data included artifact collection and focus groups with students and faculty. Artifacts were analyzed through deductive coding aligned with the CPED principles and design concepts, while focus group transcripts were inductively coded using in vivo coding. Artifact analysis showed that the CPED Framework© was deeply embedded in the program's architecture, and focus group analysis revealed alignment between participants' experiences and the CPED ideas. However, CPED language was not used consistently in program community discourse. This suggests that our program’s commitment to the CPED Framework© operated as tacit theory-in-use rather than as an explicitly articulated one. Drawing on Argyris and Schon’s (1974) distinction between espoused theory and theory-in-use, this study highlighted the importance of making guiding commitments visible within program dialogue. The findings suggest that self-study can serve as both a methodology and a pedagogical practice through which EdD programs examine and intentionally cultivate the visibility of their guiding commitments.

References

Argyris & Schön (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2014). Self-Study of teacher education practices as a pedagogy for teacher educator professional development. In International Teacher Education: Promising Pedagogies (Part A) (Vol. 22, pp. 137-152). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Kember, D., Ha, T. S., Lam, B. H., Lee, A., NG, S., Yan, L., & Yum, J. C. K. (1997). The diverse role of the critical friend in supporting educational action research projects. Educational Action Research, 5(3), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799700200036

LaBoskey, (2004). The method of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In, J.J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, & V. K. LaBoskey (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices: (pp. 817-870). Springer International Handbooks of Education.

Markos, A., Buss, R., & Marsh, J. (2024). From reacting to re-imagining: Using pandemic adaptations for program advancement. Impacting Education, 9(1), 1–6.

Pape, S. J., & Perry, J. A. (2026). CPED Framework Implementation and Impact Rubrics Self-Study: An Overview. Impacting Education, 11(4), 3–11.

Perry, J. A., & Imig, D. G. (2008, Nov-Dec). A Stewardship of Practice in Education. Change, 40(6), 42–48.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers [3rd Edition]. Sage Publishing.

Schön, D. A. (1992). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Taylor & Francis Group.

Whitehead, J. (2000). How do I improve my practice? Creating and legitimizing an epistemology of practice. Reflective Practitioner, 1(1), 91–104.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-22

How to Cite

Markos, A. (2026). Making Commitments Visible: A Self-Study of CPED Enactment in an EdD Program . Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 11(4), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2026.640

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2026): Themed-CPED Programs Self-Study

Section

Themed-CPED Programs Self-Study

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Amy Markos

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.