Project-Based Learning and Doctoral Student Research Skill Development: A Case Study

  • Nancy Fichtman Dana University of Florida
  • James Rigney SUNY Plattsburgh
  • Vicki Vescio University of Florida
  • Vera Wei Ma University of Florida
Keywords: project-based learning, action research, practitioner research, doctoral education

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to understand the ways doctoral students in an online Ed.D. program developed their skills as practitioner researchers through a project-based learning (PBL) experience. In order to describe and analyze the nature of the students’ PBL experiences, case study methodology was used. Interviews, a video-recording of a two-hour synchronous class session, and student generated artifacts were iteratively analyzed by a team of researchers. Results reveal underlying tensions within three case themes: individual versus collective learning, simulated versus real research experience, and public class activity versus private group conversations. These findings demonstrate that Ed.D. program area faculty must balance the competing tensions raised by these case themes in order to facilitate research skill development and foster the ability of their students to grow as practitioner scholars.

Author Biographies

Nancy Fichtman Dana, University of Florida

Professor

School of Teaching and Learning, College of Education

James Rigney, SUNY Plattsburgh

PhD Candidate

School of Teaching and Learning, College of Education

Vicki Vescio, University of Florida

Clinical Assistant Professor

School of Teaching and Learning, College of Education

Vera Wei Ma, University of Florida

PhD Candidate

School of Teaching and Learning, College of Education

References

Adams, A., Bondy, E., Ross, D., Dana, N. F., & Kennedy-Lewis, B. (2014). Implementing an online professional practice doctoral program in a PhD environment: Managing the dilemmas. Journal of School Public Relations, 35(3), 363-382.

Arslan-Ari, I., Ari, F., Grant, M. M., & Morris, W. S. (2018). Action research experiences for scholarly practitioners in an online education doctorate program: Design, reality, and lessons learned. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 62(5), 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0308-3

Barnett, B. G., & Muth, R. (2008). Using action-research strategies and cohort structures to ensure research competence for practitioner-scholar leaders. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 3(1), 1-42.

Buss, R. R. (2018). Using action research as a signature pedagogy to develop EdD students’ inquiry as practice abilities. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/IE.2018.46

Buss, R. R., & Avery, A. (2017). Research becomes you: Cultivating EdD students’ identities as educational leaders and researchers and a “learning by doing” meta-study. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12(3), 273-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775116674463

Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED). (2019). The CPED framework. https://www.cpedinitiative.org/the-framework

Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED). (2014). Development of the CPED working principles. https://www.cpedinitiative.org/page/HistoryPrinciples

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (Fourth edition). SAGE.

Dana, N. F., Adams, A., Bondy, E. Kennedy, B., Lowery, R., Swain, C., Pringle, R., & Ross, D. (2011, April). The development of practitioner scholars as teacher professional development: Exploring the problems and possibilities inherent in building an online professional practice doctoral program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2020). The reflective educator's guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry (4th edition). Corwin.

David, J. L. (2008). What research says about... Project-based learning. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 80-82.

Firestone, W. A., Perry, J. A., Leland, A. S., & McKeon, R. T. (2019). Teaching Research and Data Use in the Education Doctorate. Journal of Research on Leadership Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775119872231

Guthrie, J.W. (2009). The case for a modern doctor of education degree (Ed.D.): Multipurpose education doctorates no longer appropriate. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(1), 3-8.

Hooks, B. (2013). Writing beyond race: Living theory and practice. Routledge.

Hung, C.-M., Hwang, G.-J., & Huang, I. (2012). A project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students’ learning motivation, problem-solving competence and learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 368-379.

Kerrigan, M. R., & Hayes, K. M. (2016). EdD students’ self-efficacy and interest in conducting research. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 147-162.

Kumar, S., & Dawson, K. (2018). An online doctorate for researching professionals: Program design, implementation, and evaluation. Athabasca University Press.

Lambie, G. W., Hayes, B. G., Griffith, C., Limberg, D., & Mullen, P. R. (2014). An exploratory investigation of the research self-efficacy, interest in research, and research knowledge of Ph.D. in education students. Innovative Higher Education, 39(2), 139-153.

Leech, N. (2012). Educating knowledgeable and skilled researchers in doctoral programs in schools of education: A new model. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 019-037. https://doi.org/10.28945/1558

Leech, N., & Haug, C. A. (2015). Investigating graduate level research and statistics courses in schools of education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 093-110. https://doi.org/10.28945/2111

Lovitts, B. E. (2005). Being a good course‐taker is not enough: A theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500043093

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

McClintock, C. (2004). The scholar-practitioner model. Encyclopedia of distributed learning, 393-396.

Moore, E. Jr., Penick-Paris, M.W., Michael, A. (Eds.). (2015). Everyday white people confront racial and social injustice: 15 stories. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Neumann, R. (2005). Doctoral differences: Professional doctorates and PhDs compared. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 173-188.

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Pilkington, R. M. (2009). Practitioner research in education: The critical perspectives of doctoral students. Studies in the Education of Adults, 41(2), 154-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2009.11661579

Perry, J. A. (2013). Introduction: Developing stewards of practice. In Perry, J. A. & Carlson, D. L. (Eds), In their own words: A journey to the stewardship of the practice in education (pp. 1-14). Information Age Publishing.

Perry, J. A., & Imig, D. G. (2008). A stewardship of practice in education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(6), 42-49.

Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Sensoy, Ö., & DiAngelo, R. J. (2012). Is everyone really equal? An introduction to key concepts in social justice education. Teachers College Press.

Sensoy, Ö., & DiAngelo, R. J. (2017). Is everyone really equal?: An introduction to key concepts in social justice education (Second; J. A. Banks, Ed.). Teachers College Press.

Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622015

Shulman, L., Golde, C.M., Bueschel, A.C. & Garabedian, K.J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25-32.

Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2008). Editorial: Envisioning the future stewards of the social-behavioral research enterprise. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(4), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808322946

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.

Vaughan, M., Boerum, C., & Whitehead, L. S. (2019). Action research in doctoral coursework: Perceptions of independent research experiences. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 13(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130106

Wetzel, K., & Ewbank, A. (2013). Conceptualizing the innovation: Factors influencing doctoral candidates’ interventions in the action research dissertation. Educational Action Research, 21(3), 392-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.813402

Zambo, D. (2011). Action research as signature pedagogy in an education doctorate program: The reality and hope. Innovative Higher Education, 36(4), 261-271.

Published
2021-10-19
How to Cite
Dana, N. F., Rigney, J., Vescio, V., & Ma, V. W. (2021). Project-Based Learning and Doctoral Student Research Skill Development: A Case Study. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(4), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.148
Section
Research Articles