Emerging Scholarly Practitioners
Utilizing Course-Embedded Research Projects
Keywords:self-study, Doctor of Education, scholarly practitioners, teacher as researcher
The purpose of this research project was to explore doctoral student learning and development as scholarly practitioners through one innovative method: a course-based self-study. This self-study empowered doctoral candidates in three key forms of data collection: 1) two project-based course assignments; 2) a survey on course-based student learning; and 3) a self-reflection on learning in the self-study. Results indicate positive impacts in addressing real-life problems and in connecting students to cohort members. The application of skills and knowledge in a course-embedded self-study connects to the Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) principles of creating scholarly practitioners and also developing activist leaders who build coalitions and focus on researching real life social justice issues. This study can serve as an exemplar for similar EdD programs who are developing scholarly practitioners.
Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. General Learning Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Becton, Y. J., Bogiages, C., D'Amico, L., Lilly, T., Currin, E., Jeffries, R., & Tamim, S. (2020). An emerging framework for the EdD activist. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 5(2), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2020.131
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
Buss, R., Zambo, R., Zambo, D., & Williams, T. (2014). Developing researching professionals in an EdD program. Higher Education, Skills and Work - Based Learning, 4(2), 137–160.
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED). (2021). The CPED Framework. https://www.cpedinitiative.org/the-framework
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2020). SEL: What Are the Core Competence Areas and Where are they Promoted? https://casel.org/sel-framework/
Caskey, M. M., Stevens, D. D., & Yeo, M. (2020). Examining doctoral student development of a researcher identity: Using the draw a researcher test. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2020.92
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
Danielson, C. (2017). Kentucky framework for teaching. Kentucky Department of Education. https://education.ky.gov/teachers/PGES/TPGES/Documents/Kentucky%20Adapted%20Danielson%20Framework%20for%20Teaching%20with%20OPGES%20frameworks.pdf
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science + Business Media.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Heath and Company.
Dover, A. G., Kressler, B., & Lozano, M. (2020). “Learning our way through”: Critical professional development for social justice in teacher education. The New Educator, 16(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2019.1671566
Epstein, J. L. (1992). School and family partnerships in Alkin, M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed., pp. 1139-1151). Macmillan.
Fifolt, M., & Breaux, A. P. (2018). Exploring student experiences with the cohort model in an executive EdD program in the Southeastern United States. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66(3), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2018.1525518
Firth, J. (2021). A systematic review of interleaving as a concept learning strategy. Review of Education, 9(2), 642–684.
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for Culturally Responsive Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Walker, J. M. T., Sandler, H. M., Whetsel, D., Green, C. L., Wilkins, A. S., Closson, K. (2005). Why do parents become involved? Research findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal. 106(2), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1086/499194
Knowles, M. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. Association Press.
Lei, S., Gorelick, D., Short, K., Smallwood, L., & Wright-Porter, K. (2011). Academic cohorts: Benefits and drawbacks of being a member of a community of learners. Education, 131(3), 497–504.
Loughran, J. (2018). Learning about self-study of teacher education practices. In J. K. Ritter, M. Lunenberg, K. Pithouse-Morgan, A. P. Samaras, & E. Vanassche (Eds.), Teaching, learning, and enacting of self-study methodology: Unraveling a complex interplay. (pp. 1-7). Springer.
Martin, S. B., Gournaris, K., Jaffery, Z., Hatfield, L., Jung, S. J., Xiang, L., Anderson, I., & Caskey, M. M. (2021). EdD graduate perspectives: Uplifting our own voices. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.124
Murakami-Ramalho, E., Piert, J., & Militello, M. (2008). The wanderer, the chameleon, and the warrior: Experiences of doctoral students of color developing a research identity in educational administration. Qualitative Inquiry. 14(5), 806–834. doi:10.1177/1077800408318309
Peercy, M. M., Alkandil, D., Caufman, R., Hudson, S., Lane, S., Petillo, A. E., Reeves, E., & Sonnier, A. (2018). “Standing in a messy sandpit”: The learning side of self-study research. In J. K. Ritter, M. Lunenberg, K. Pithouse-Morgan, A. P. Samaras, & E. (Eds.), Teaching, learning, and enacting of self-study methodology (pp. 259-273). Springer.
Picower, B. (2015). Nothing about us without us: Teacher-driven critical professional development. Radical Pedagogy, 12(1), 1–26.
Ralston, N. C., Tarasawa, B., Waggoner, J. M., Smith, R., & Naegele, Z. (2016). Developing practitioner-scholars through university-district research partnerships. Journal of Public Scholarship in Higher Education, 6, 94–107.
Ralston, N. C., & Smith, R. (2022). The pandemic as a soundtrack for the dissertation journey: Obtaining flow during unprecedented times. Journal of Research on Leadership Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751221125257
Ryan, A. M., & Watson, S. (2021). Impact and inclusion: Transforming an EdD program into a crucible for systems change. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.123
Saldaña, J. M. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business.
Wagner, T. L. (2014). A retrospective analysis of leadership identity development and career paths of doctoral student completers in one leadership program. Ashland University.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Rebecca Smith, Cathie Bush, Andrea Cooper, Sarah Fedoration, Maureen Ference, Sharon Fischer, Janice Francis, Karen Gartner, Sherri Humphrys, Camille Loken, Bev Lyseng, Randy Lyseng, Janice Muench, Nicole Ralston, Kate Syson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.