An Unexpected Affordance of Program Design for Dissertation Writing During COVID-19: The Embedded Dissertation
Purpose: This paper describes how an embedded dissertation program design feature supported two cohorts of EdD dissertators and helped them make consistent progress toward and eventually complete their dissertation milestones during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, we detail the work, challenges, and results of EdD students’ efforts toward their milestones and offer perspectives on the same topics for EdD faculty who are teaching dissertation writing courses or supporting dissertators during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conceptual Argument: This paper argues that an existing program design feature, the embedded dissertation, provided unexpected affordances for EdD dissertators during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, it acted as a scaffold for dissertators to make small but consistent steps forward on their dissertation milestones despite the significant challenges they faced both as practitioners and as students during the pandemic.
Implications for Research: In sharing these experiences, we hope to: (a) offer a contribution to the literature on the intersection of program design and dissertation writing, (b) proffer a program design structure that was successful in moving dissertators forward during COVID-19, and (c) document the lived experiences of EdD dissertators and faculty in this unprecedented, historical moment.
Aitchison, C. (2009). Writing groups for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 905-916. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902785580
Capello, S. A. (2020). Leveraging PhD students to support EdD dissertation writing. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 5(3), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2020.110
Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions-A literature review. SageOpen, 6(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777
Bowen, W., & Rudenstine, N. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph.D. Princeton University Press.
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2019). The CPED framework. Retrieved from https://www.cpedinitiative.org/the-framework
Cassuto, L. (2013). Ph.D. attrition: How much is too much? The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/PhD-Attrition-How-Much-Is/140045
Crossman, J. M., & Kite, S. L. (2012). Facilitated improved writing among students through directed peer review. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(3), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412452980
Council of Graduate Schools. (2012). Attrition and completion. Retrieved from http://cgsnet.org/attrition-and-completion
Ferguson, T. (2009). The ‘write’ skills and more: A thesis writing group for doctoral students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260902734968
Hochschild, A. (1983/2012). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.
Maher, D., Seaton, L., McMullen, C., Fitzgerald, T., Otsuji, E., & Lee, A. (2008). “Becoming and being writers”: The experiences of doctoral students in writing groups. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(3), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370802439870
Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Padilla, M. A., & Thompson, J. N. (2016). Burning out faculty at doctoral research universities. Stress and Health, 32, 551-558. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2661
Perry, J. A. (2015). The Carnegie project on the education doctorate. Change, The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(3), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2015.1040712
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Holmes, J., & Stephens, J. S. (2019). Identifying significant personal and program factors that predict online EdD students’ program integration. Online Learning Journal, 23(4), 313-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.1579
Rose, M., & McClafferty, K. A. (2001). A call for the teaching of writing in graduate education. Educational Researcher, 30(2), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030002027
Salee, M., Hallett, R., & Tierney, W. (2011). Teaching writing in graduate school. College Teaching, 59, 66-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.511315
Schulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003025
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of candidate attrition (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
Copyright (c) 2021 Sarah Capello, Mellissa Gyimah-Concepcion, Victoria Vandover Billimack
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.