Challenging the Notion of the Pipeline Problem in STEM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2024.442

Keywords:

women, STEM, career search, pipeline, self-efficacy

Abstract

It is widely known that women are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). We have a lack of women who choose STEM careers and women leave these careers at a higher rate than men. Women of color are especially underrepresented and face additional hurtles in building their STEM career. While interventions often focus on increasing female interest and confidence in STEM, my work addresses the lack of research on how STEM recruiting and hiring practices impact female career progression and career decision making (Friedmann & Efrat-Treister, 2023). Through identifying barriers women face during the recruitment process, I seek to break down societal inequities that limit female career progression in technology roles and lead to women feeling insecure about their career prospects despite having confidence in their technical skillsets.

References

Behroozi, M., Shirolkar, S., Barik, T., & Parnin, C. (2020). Does stress impact technical interview performance? Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368089.3409712

Cabay, M., Bernstein, B. L., Rivers, M., & Fabert, N. (2018). Chilly climates, balancing acts, and shifting pathways: What happens to women in STEM doctoral programs. Social Sciences, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7020023

Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science: Women ≠ scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315622645

CompTIA. (2023, March 10). Pullback in tech employment modest relative to expectations, CompTIA analysis of latest labor market data finds. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pullback-in-tech-employment-modest-relative-to-expectations-comptia-analysis-of-latest-labor-market-data-finds-301769187.html

Dannals, J. E., Zlatev, J. J., Halevy, N., & Neale, M. A. (2021). The dynamics of gender and alternatives in negotiation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(11), 1655–1672. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000867

Dey, F., & Cruzvergara, C. Y. (2014). Evolution of career services in higher education. New Directions for Student Services, 2014(148), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20105

Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/e664062007-001

Fouad, N. A., & Santana, M. C. (2017). SCCT and underrepresented populations in STEM fields: Moving the needle. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716658324

Friedmann, E., & Efrat-Treister, D. (2023). Gender bias in STEM hiring: Implicit in-group gender favoritism among men managers. Gender & Society, 37(1), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432221137910

Herring, C. (2009). Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400203

Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). From Constructivism to critical constructivism. In Critical Constructivism Primer (pp. 1–40). https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=35947097&site=ehost-live

Martinez, A., & Christnacht, C. (2021, January 6). Women Are Nearly Half of U.S. Workforce but Only 27% of STEM Workers. Census.Gov. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/01/women-making-gains-in-stem-occupations-but-still-underrepresented.html

McKinsey & Company. (2022). Women in the Workplace 2022 (pp. 1–61). https://womenintheworkplace.com/

National Career Development Association. (2011). Career development: A policy statement of the National Career Development Association. https://www.ncda.org/aws/NCDA/asset_manager/get_file/39958?ver=29369

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). (2023). Diversity and STEM: Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities 2023 (Special Report NSF 23-315). National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd

National Center for Women and Information Technology. (2022). Women and Information Technology By the Numbers. https://ncwit.org/resource/bythenumbers/

Nobel, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression. New York University Press. https://nyupress.org/9781479837243/algorithms-of-oppression

Pew Research Center. (2018). Women and Men in STEM Often at Odds Over Workplace Equity. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/01/PS_2018.01.09_STEM_1-09.png

Speer, J. D. (2023). Bye bye Ms. American Sci: Women and the leaky STEM pipeline. Economics of Education Review, 93, 102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102371

Twine, F. W. (2018). Technology’s invisible women: Black geek girls in silicon valley and the failure of diversity initiatives. International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies, 1(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.13169/intecritdivestud.1.1.0058

Downloads

Published

2024-08-06

How to Cite

Andersen, R. K. (2024). Challenging the Notion of the Pipeline Problem in STEM. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 9(3), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2024.442

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024): Voices from CANDEL: Leading for Equity and the Scholar-Practitioner Journey

Section

Themed-Leadership for Equity: Voices from CANDEL

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Rebecca K. Andersen

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.