Framework for Integrating Generative AI Into Statistical Training in Doctor of Education Programs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.518

Keywords:

generative AI, statistics anxiety, EdD programs, constructivism, self-regulated learning

Abstract

This paper proposes a framework for integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools into statistical training for Doctor of Education (EdD) students. The rigorous demands of doctoral education, coupled with the challenges of learning complex statistical software and coding language, often lead to anxiety and frustration among students, particularly those in part-time or online programs. This article explores how generative AI can serve as a scaffold for learning, potentially mitigating statistics anxiety and enhancing students’ abilities to focus on core statistical concepts rather than software intricacies. The proposed framework, grounded in constructivist learning theory, outlines a process for faculty to facilitate dialogues using generative AI tools that support students in developing research questions, selecting appropriate statistical tests, checking assumptions, and conducting statistical analyses. By leveraging AI as a dialogic partner, students can engage in self-regulated learning and enhance critical thinking skills essential for practitioner-scholars. This approach has the potential to improve statistical training in EdD programs, producing more competent translators of research who can effectively apply and interpret statistical methods in their professional practice. The article concludes by discussing implications for EdD programs and suggestions for improving the curriculum that includes statistical training.

References

Acton, K. S. (2023). Reinventing EdD research methods courses: Elevating traditional teaching with transformative learning. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 8(4), 3–10.

Alnofaie, S. S. (2018). Statistics anxiety towards learning new statistical software (Master's thesis). Rochester Institute of Technology.

Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9

Barnett, B. G., & Muth, R. (2008). Using action research strategies and cohort structures to ensure research competence for practitioner-scholar leaders. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 3(1), 1–42.

Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Prospects and challenges for inquiry-based approaches to learning. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 199–225). Jossey-Bass.

Bates, P. J., & Goff, L. (2012). The invisible student: Benefits and challenges of part-time doctoral studies. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 58, 368–380. http://ajer.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/ajer/article/view/1054/894

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007

Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1). http://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/718

Chew, P. K., & Dillon, D. B. (2014). Statistics anxiety update: Refining the construct and recommendations for a new research agenda. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613518077

Chiou, C.-C., Wang, Y.-M., & Lee, L.-T. (2014). Reducing statistics anxiety and enhancing statistics learning achievement: Effectiveness of a one-minute strategy. Psychological Reports, 115, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.2466/11.04.PR0.115c12x3

Cruise, R., Cash, R., & Bolton, D. (1985). Development and validation of instrument to measure statistical anxiety. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, Section on Statistical Education (pp. 92–97). American Statistical Association.

DeVaney, T. A. (2010). Anxiety and attitudes of graduate students in on-campus vs. online statistics courses. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2010.11889472

Ellis, A. R., & Slade, E. (2023). A new era of learning: Considerations for ChatGPT as a tool to enhance statistics and data science education. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education,

(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2023.2223609

Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1

Haller, E. J. (1979). Questionnaires and the dissertation in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15(1), 47–66.

Jimerson, J. B., & Wayman, J. C. (2015). Professional learning for using data: Examining teacher needs and supports. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700405

Kuznetsov, A. (2024). The analysis of the efficiency of generative AI algorithms for creating a natural dialogue. The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research, 6(6), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/Volume06Issue06-08

Labaree, D. F. (2003). The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004013

Li, Z., Oon, P. T. E., & Chai, S. (2024). Examining the impact of teacher scaffolding in the knowledge building environment: Insights from students’ interaction patterns, social epistemic networks, and academic performance. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12535-z

Macher, D., Paechter, M., Papousek, I., & Ruggeri, K. (2012). Statistics anxiety, trait anxiety, learning behavior, and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology and Education, 27, 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0090-5

Megahed, F. M., Chen, Y. J., Ferris, J. A., Knoth, S., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2024). How generative AI models such as ChatGPT can be (mis)used in SPC practice, education, and research? An exploratory study. Quality Engineering, 36(2), 287–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2023.2206479

Nolan, D., & Temple Lang, D. (2010). Computing in the statistics curricula. The American Statistician, 64, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2010.09132

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Wilson, V. A. (2010). Statistics anxiety: Nature, etiology, antecedents, effects, and treatments: A comprehensive review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2), 195–209.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daley, C. E. (1999). Perfectionism and statistics anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 1089–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00214-1

Onwuegbuzie, A., DaRos, D., & Ryan, J. (1997). The components of statistics anxiety: A phenomenological study. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11–35.

Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. Elsevier Science & Technology.

Radford, A., & Narasimhan, K. (2018). Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training.

Robertson, J., Ferreira, C., Botha, E., & Oosthuizen, K. (2024). Game changers: A generative AI prompt protocol to enhance human-AI knowledge co-construction. Business Horizons.

Siew, C. S. Q., McCartney, M. J., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2019). Using network science to understand statistics anxiety among college students. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/st10000133

Downloads

Published

2025-02-07

How to Cite

Eith, C., & Zawada, D. (2025). Framework for Integrating Generative AI Into Statistical Training in Doctor of Education Programs . Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 10(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.518

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): The Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Doctoral Research and Writing

Section

Themed-The Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Doctoral Research and Writing

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Christine Eith, Denise Zawada

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.