Real Problems, Real Practice
A Practitioner-Focused Approach to Comprehensive Exams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2026.550Keywords:
CPED, EdD, problem of practice, scholar-practitioner, pedagogical innovation, comprehensive examsAbstract
The University of Findlay utilized Palmer and Giering’s (2023) taxonomy of pedagogical innovation as a useful framework for examining and explaining how the programmatic innovation of the embedded comprehensive exams (ECE) evolved as part of its Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) program of the year award application. ECE are comprised of course-based assessments aligned with students’ problems of practice and CPED principles. The pedagogical redesign improved students’ research competencies, scholarly practitioner identities, and sense of belonging. Faculty experienced reduced workload and enhanced mentoring opportunities. ECE have empowered students to address complex, equity-driven problems within their communities contributing to the development of scholarly practitioners.
References
Alba, C., & Fraumeni, B. R. (2019). Student engagement: Evidence-based strategies to boost academic and social-emotional results. McREL International. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED600576.pdf
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (2018). 365 days of the Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. https://cped.memberclicks. net/assets/resource-center/docs/cped_2018_annual_report_fina.pdf
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2022). The CPED framework. Retrieved from https://www.cpedinitiative.org/the-framework
Gillham, J., & Schilling, N. V. (2023). Assessing online doctoral student research competencies. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 8(4), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.296
Palmer, M., & Giering, J. A. (2023). Characterizing pedagogical innovation in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 49(3), 453-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09681-6
Perry, J. A., & Imig, D. G. (2016). What do we mean by impact? Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2016.26
Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20027998
Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education's doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25-32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003025
Student handbook. (2025). College of Education Intranet. https://www.findlay.edu/intranet/colleges/education/SiteAssets/Pages/edd-candidates/Ed.D.%20Student%20Handbook%203.25.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jennifer C. Theriault, Nicole V. Schilling, Amanda K. Ochsner

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
