An Approach to an Online EdD in Community College Leadership Program
The purpose of this article is to provide an example of how an EdD in Community College Leadership program is offered in an online format. First, the benefits of online programs, including increased access and flexibility for working professionals and higher levels of diversity among the student body are discussed. Then, several strategies to promote connection among students and to facilitate a supportive, engaging learning environment virtually are shared. For example, the value of using a cohort model, a carefully designed curriculum with assignments that have practical value, and a balance of synchronous and asynchronous learning activities is described. Finally, the important role of and strategies for incorporating models and mentors into an online doctoral program are discussed.
American Association of Community Colleges (2018). AACC competencies for community college leaders. 3rd edition. https://www.aacc.nche.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/AACC-2018-Competencies_111618_5.1.pdf
Barnett, B. G., Basom, M. R., Yerkes, D. M., & Norris, C. J. (2000). Cohorts in educational leadership programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 255.
Berry, S. (2017). Student support networks in online doctoral programs: Exploring nested communities. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 33–48.
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) (n.d.). The CPED framework. https://cped.memberclicks.net/the-framework
Cohen, J.B., Gammel, J.A. and Rutstein-Riley, A. (2016). Learning like adults: A hybrid interdisciplinary doctoral program for mid-career professionals. Emerging Directions in Doctoral Education. Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning. 6, 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120160000006032
Dembicki, M. (2018, March 8). Not as diverse as they should be. Community College Daily. https://www.ccdaily.com/2018/03/not-as-diverse-as-it-should-be/
Gaskell, A., & Mills, P. (2014). The quality and reputation of open, distance, and e-learning: What are the challenges? Open learning. The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning, 29, 190–205.
Hermond, D., & Tanner, T. (2020). Mastering critical thinking competencies in online graduate
classes. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 10(1), 47-58. DOI:10.5929/2020.10.1.4
Kezar, A. J., Drivalas, Y., & Kitchen, J. (2018). Envisioning public scholarship for our time : Models for higher education researchers. Stylus Publishing.
Lea, Mary R. (2004). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739–756.
Lieberman, M. (2018, April 25). Online students don’t have to work solo. Inside Higher Ed.https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2018/04/25/group-projects-online-classes-create-connections-and-challenge
Lovitts, B., and C. Nelson. 2000. The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from Ph.D. programs. Academe 86, (6): 44–50.
Nimer, M. (2009). The Doctoral cohort model: Increasing opportunities for success. College Student Journal, 43(4), 1373–1379.
O’Keefe, L., Rafferty, J., Gunder, A., Vignare, K. (2020, May 18). Delivering high-quality instruction online in response to COVID-19: Faculty playbook. Every Learner Everywhere. http://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources
Peralta Community College District. (2020). Describing the Peralta equity rubric. Peralta Community College District. https://web.peralta.edu/de/files/2020/10/Describing-the-Peralta-Equity-Rubric_Oct-2020.pdf
Perez, R. J., Robbins, C. K., Harris, L. W., & Montgomery, C. (2020). Exploring graduate students' socialization to equity, diversity, and inclusion. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(2), 133-145. doi: 10.1037/dhe0000115
Sankaran, S. R., & Bui, T. (2000). Impact of learning strategies and motivation on performance: A study in web-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(3), 191-198,
Smith, D. L., & Lovat, T. J. (2003). Curriculum: Action on reflection (4th ed.). Tuggerah: Social Science Press.
Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning, A review of the literature. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23-32.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Expanded 2nd edition. Pearson.
Copyright (c) 2021 Christine Harrington, Kimberlee Hooper, AnnMarie Hughes, Eric Klein, John Melendez, Faraz Siddique, Ellen Wasserman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.